I mostly use the bayonet for that pesky sniper or MG that I sneak up on.
That or when the enemy is too close for the rifle to be effective.
@offtopic:
I was always curious why the military in WW2 never went beyond the bayonet for close combat...sure most battles are distance shooting conflicts, but close combat is still encountered a lot. And in some cases gunfire is a bad idea (e.g. combat in a fuel depot) for the situation.
Seriously, if you're out of ammo, the rifle with a bayonet is nothing more than a unbalanced jabbing spear...without it, an awkward club at best.
I saw a WW2 Swiss bayonet in a collection once that looked like it had the length and heft to be used as a effective short sword...but nothing since.
It's not like the soldiers in WW2 had body armour like today.
Can anyone offer some insight?
That or when the enemy is too close for the rifle to be effective.
@offtopic:
I was always curious why the military in WW2 never went beyond the bayonet for close combat...sure most battles are distance shooting conflicts, but close combat is still encountered a lot. And in some cases gunfire is a bad idea (e.g. combat in a fuel depot) for the situation.
Seriously, if you're out of ammo, the rifle with a bayonet is nothing more than a unbalanced jabbing spear...without it, an awkward club at best.
I saw a WW2 Swiss bayonet in a collection once that looked like it had the length and heft to be used as a effective short sword...but nothing since.
It's not like the soldiers in WW2 had body armour like today.
Can anyone offer some insight?
Upvote
0