Beta Map RO-PariserPlatz-III-ISU-152

[smokeythebear]

I think the amount of tanker classes should be dropped so only 2 or 1 crew per tank. It works very well for the map RO-mushkova_river. It only takes 1 idiot out of 3 crew to sabotage a tank, this way there is less chance of it happening. Only in a fantasy land do 3 good tankers end up in the same tank

 

[Ravelo]

I found this bug ... In the coordinate E2

 

[Luther]

fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me!

if tankers get their tanks destroyed by a spawnraping fauster time after time, then it might be best for them not to use tanks.
the allies get a new batch of tanks when they have capped the gate approach. its up to them to keep their tank alive as long as possible, up to now i have succeeded in fighting the full 35 minutes with the first 3 tanks, not even using the new tanks that spawn in after the gate approach was capped. other tankers used them, and we ended up with 2 ISU tanks and 1 t34 fighting together on the platz. ending up with discovering the big problem of this tank: little ammo supply, wich was a problem with the real tank aswell

one hint i can give you with the ISU-152 is to stay out of faust reach, and simply avoid any exposition to other tanks or AT guns, the HE shells can take out PAK guns and PAKwagens with indirect fire.
stay at least 100 m from the nearest german soldier.

All I say mate is play on a Aussie server while this map is being played. Competent tankers on both sides, I can't discreted them, but unless you have a hand full of infantry watching the tanks and who dive in the air to stop a 100ft faust come out of no where your in for a hard time. Also sitting back in the distance away from the main infantry threat is a sure way to get kicked, I mean FF must be very high, especially for the middle objective, which btw rocks if your a German with a mg 42 and the new mutator

Anyway love the map, but from the Allied side their second objective on the right, there is a fair few trees in the air, maybe 3 ft, no big problem, just noticeable .

 

[Zetsumei]

is it maybe possible with the respawns of the ISU to make it time dependent more. So not that if you destroy it in the first 3 mins that you have another one to drive away with straight away?

 

[Sidus Preclarum]

Also sitting back in the distance away from the main infantry threat is a sure way to get kicked, I mean FF must be very high, especially for the middle objective

which leads us to the following remark: when you've been tked by a tanker, MGer or Saper with a score nearing or above 100, why the hell won't you forgive him ? what are the odds or this being intentionnal, and a player with a score of 100 being a griefer ? Chances are, mr "I_R0x_4l1!" with the 10 points score (fictivous name, but you catch my drift), that just by not typing "np" you're putting your team at a far worse disadvantage than the temporary accidental death of your own person incured, however much said death pissed you off personnaly... All of this espcially if the Tker took the pains to say sorry, or tked you because you really were where you weren't supposed to be...
I've seen so many suboptimal ( ok: downright stupid) behaviour on RO, but playing long maps recently has brought this one to a new level or relevancy...

 

[SchutzeSepp]

is it maybe possible with the respawns of the ISU to make it time dependent more. So not that if you destroy it in the first 3 mins that you have another one to drive away with straight away?

if it was possible i would do the exact opposite!
letting tanks only respawn after 5 minutes, forcing the tankers to at least keep their tank alive for 5 minutes. wich rewards good tankers.

@luther and ravelo, thanks for pointing out those problems, will be fixed!

we must all keep in mind that most of the players you will see these days playing pariserplatz, are only playing it to see the ISU-152.
i noticed that many never even played any other version of the map before.
when the "OMG a new TANK!" period is over, we will then be able to judge it better. and it can only get better.

let's just hope that in the next TW game, players will need to pass tests to be able to select any other classes then the riflemen. just like in AA

 

[Dumba [cro]]

i noticed that many never even played any other version of the map before.
when the "OMG a new TANK!" period is over, we will then be able to judge it better. and it can only get better.

I never played it before, and I couldn't care less about tanks

I still think it's a great map

 

[Luther]

Just played as a Allied tanker and wow the ISU rocks, I am lucky though as the many many many tk I did get everyone forgave (massive kill distance). I find it sad though that most people will not forgive so many tankers will be kicked.

 

[Trendkill]

I really wish TWB would add all the new content and maps from AHZ to their servers... Then I'd have a place to play all these new maps without worrying about ping or too few people playing.

 

[TT33]

I really wish TWB would add all the new content and maps from AHZ to their servers... Then I'd have a place to play all these new maps without worrying about ping or too few people playing.

I would suggest this idea to the TWB on their forum.

 

[Makhno [Anarchist]]

I found a hole in the ground in the west end of Wilhelm Str. - I think You can fall through the map if You are VERY clumsy

Btw, I really love this map!!!

 

[Trendkill]

I would suggest this idea to the TWB on their forum.

Well my thinking was that the release was a well known thing and if they haven't added it to their servers already there must be a reason.

 

[entertainer]

Well my thinking was that the release was a well known thing and if they haven't added it to their servers already there must be a reason.

The files where on The Wild Bunch 50 player server. The maps where removed from rotation because the player count went down to a very low level. However some of the maps are still in rotation on The Wild Bunch Old Glory server. Coincidentally the player counts there are almost non-existent since adding the maps.
Again, no dis-respect to the modders, there work is very good and very appreciated.

That's kinda obvious considering that most of the "retarded" players play in TWB servers.
While such servers like "LUFTWAFFE GERMANY" or "LKGO" never suffers from low player count... yesterday we played PariserPlatz, then voted for Kriegstadt, then again voted for PariserPlatz and so on...

 

[Trendkill]

Due to the apparent abundance of panzerfausts could I suggest only allowing players to carry one at a time, if this is possible?

 

[Sidus Preclarum]

Due to the apparent abundance of panzerfausts could I suggest only allowing players to carry one at a time, if this is possible?

Afaik, Kriegstadt allow for only 2 per person, so I'd guess yes.

 

[EvilHobo]

It requires that an entirely new Panzerfaust class be created, however.

 

[Sidus Preclarum]

It requires that an entirely new Panzerfaust class be created, however.

Suspected as much, but wasn't certain, being a boeotian in such matters ...

 

[18Bravo]

Really dislike being on the business end of that ISU, regular HE works just about as good as the APHE on the panther, even more so if there is infantry taking cover nearby. One thing though about it, is it me, or does anyone else think the driver's hatch shuts a bit too quickly?

 

[smokeythebear]

Few things, most you would probably find if you took a look around.

-Some random room is on full bright.
-Arty goes through the roof of some buildings
-Many useless rooms that could be deleted for optimization
-Maybe make some other optimizations...

 

[Trendkill]

It requires that an entirely new Panzerfaust class be created, however.

The question is would Schutze want to do this?