Not a big fan of how the bricks are simply laid on top of each other. A real brick wall would be cemented together and not fall apart like that...
Upvote
0
By that logic we'd still be having games with exactly the same graphics in 20 years. People need to upgrade their PCs with time or alternatively get a gaming console. This 'but not everyone could run it' sure is valid to some point(for example Crysis) but other than that come on.Wouldn't all those tons of bricks create lag for those that don't have super ninja rigs ?
I hope Physx will be available for ATI cards, namely the 48xx and 38xx series, aswell in the near future, as i own an ATI HD 3850 AGP.
From what I hear, Nvidia is trying to get ATI to adopt CUDA so they can official support PhysX. However ATI has their own dev language they are promoting as well with Intel. It's all rather complicated tbh.
Oh and let's not forget that MS is trying to trump it all with Direct X 11 which is supposed to add a supported programing language that all cards are supposed to support (which might be a good thing so we don't have multiple standards again).
This reminds me of the days when people said graphicscards aren't really necessary because the cpu can handle it too.Then again we will need newer graphics cards that can support it. But is PhysX the ultimate choice for heavy physics calculations in future even when multiple core processors each running at 5ghz or over have already become widely mainstream ?