What do you think we'll get in the first content patch?

  • Please make sure you are familiar with the forum rules. You can find them here: https://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/index.php?threads/forum-rules.2334636/

Gwart

FNG / Fresh Meat
Mar 8, 2006
250
0
0
46
*Cough* Schwimmwagen,White scout car


*More coughing* Sdkfz 250 with the cannon turret



*Choking* Brummbar , Sturmtiger


well i can dream,but any content forthcoming is all gravy.
 

Smitty

FNG / Fresh Meat
Jan 2, 2006
93
0
0
Indiana
[CoFR]BeerHunter said:
On second thought , one thing that would be nice IMO to see implimented would be Radio Operator class. After all , they did have mobile radio's during WWII even if they were big and cumbersome by todays standards.

This class could follow the battle and be available to call in artillery strikes from the front rather than having to run around looking for a radio.

And , if no one selects this class then that team is simply SOL as far as calling in strikes.

Just a thought.

This is somthing (radio operators) I've always thought would be a good idea and would great if it could be implimented into the game.
 

Jack

FNG / Fresh Meat
Nov 24, 2005
752
0
0
DraKon2k said:
No, because it is about new content, in other word new uniforms, maps, weapons, vehicles etc. and not about tweaks.

Well that was kind of my point.

No sense in adding new vehicles if the current ones are behaving unrealistically and arcadish. And we can live without additonal weapons, already enough as is. Uniforms and other cosmetic changes are secondary to the core gameplay.



It's about priorities: fix the armor system and other problems first, THEN worry about what uniforms you can add and so forth.
 

Kurtz

FNG / Fresh Meat
Jan 14, 2006
401
0
0
Grobut said:
Wha.. nobody else thinks the MP-41 will make a return? :p

Why the interest in the MP41? Is it not just an MP40 with a fixed wooden stock? What does that get you, a more powerful buttstroke attack?

I think the Nagant and C96 would be a nice addition, but vehicles and maps would definitely make more sense and would provide for more gameplay. Another small thing that is not really a bug but is annoying to me is that you have to decock and recock the p38 and tokarev when sprinting. I'd rather have you just cock it when you switch to it from a different weapon, and then it stays cocked. The current system feels too 'CS' to me, in that it has unneeded animations that seem to be there to look cool. To balance things you could also require the safety to be flipped off for the luger when you draw it.
 

shaBAM!

FNG / Fresh Meat
Mar 12, 2006
32
0
0
I know this isn't going to happen, but I would like to see, more than any new weapons or maps, bot improvements.

I also want Ponyri back. :)
 

Mauser98k

FNG / Fresh Meat
Apr 16, 2006
335
61
0
Kurtz said:
Why the interest in the MP41? Is it not just an MP40 with a fixed wooden stock? What does that get you, a more powerful buttstroke attack?

I think the Nagant and C96 would be a nice addition, but vehicles and maps would definitely make more sense and would provide for more gameplay. Another small thing that is not really a bug but is annoying to me is that you have to decock and recock the p38 and tokarev when sprinting. I'd rather have you just cock it when you switch to it from a different weapon, and then it stays cocked. The current system feels too 'CS' to me, in that it has unneeded animations that seem to be there to look cool. To balance things you could also require the safety to be flipped off for the luger when you draw it.


Well I doubt you would want to shoot yourself in the leg while running.
 

Kurtz

FNG / Fresh Meat
Jan 14, 2006
401
0
0
Mauser98k said:
Well I doubt you would want to shoot yourself in the leg while running.
It's very inconsistent between the weapons though. So it's ok to run around with a luger with the safety off, but it's not ok to run with a p38 cocked? One is just as easy to inadvertently fire as the other. In reality you'd just keep your finger out of the trigger guard until you're ready to fire, but you can't show that easily in a game.
 

Johnny555

FNG / Fresh Meat
Apr 25, 2006
95
0
0
Lancaster UK
[1.GJgr] Hptmn. Kraatz said:
Keep it in front of you and kill it from a distance and you will be fine, nothing wrong with that tank.

The T60 had its production stopped in 1942, and was replaced by the T70. Because its armour and 20mm main gun were considered underpowered.
The tank we see in RO appears to be much more effective than its real world counterpart.
 

Diamond

FNG / Fresh Meat
Apr 17, 2006
260
0
0
Netherlands
Dual wielded PTRDs. And being able to fire them wile running.

But seriously, I would like a new map and some common weapons that were used.
 

GonzoX

FNG / Fresh Meat
Feb 6, 2006
708
0
0
home.roadrunner.com
[Splat]=Gwartisan said:
*Cough* Schwimmwagen,White scout car

*Caugh* No Rivers deep enough for it *Caugh*

Personally I would welcome ANY new content be it vehicle, weapon or map.

We really need an extra Tank Map for my favourit Tank Only Server though. ;)
 

GonzoX

FNG / Fresh Meat
Feb 6, 2006
708
0
0
home.roadrunner.com
Kurtz said:
Why the interest in the MP41? Is it not just an MP40 with a fixed wooden stock? What does that get you, a more powerful buttstroke attack?

I think it gave you better control and less percieved muzzle recoil. i.e. more accurate. And it had lower rate of fire.

IOW it was to the MP44 what the PPD40 was to the PPSH.

There is a reason why many people prefer the PPD40 over the PPSH online. The MP41 was also more forgiving like the PPD40.