What does this have to do with elitism? This has to do with the fact we bought a realism/historically accurate game and there are Germans running around everywhere with experimental prototypes.
Upvote
0
MKB/AVT Availability Change Incoming
- Thread starter [TW]Ramm-Jaeger
- Start date
What does this have to do with elitism? This has to do with the fact we bought a realism/historically accurate game and there are Germans running around everywhere with experimental prototypes.
Fantasy rare prototype weapons in large numbers = Elitist forum pricks?
CoD is that way, Sir. ---->
Upvote
0
Thanks Ramm for still listening to the community. Kudos!!!
That's why some bugs and weird choices are not bothering me at all
Well, the problem is still there, kind of.
Who will chose MP40 if you can have an automatic weapon with high bullet penetration and accuracy (and scopes later?).
It is still a weird choice.
And I hope TWI will get the progress and unlock thing fixed ASAP. As the longer it goes, the higher is the chance we won't get a stat reset.
There are numerous errors in the stat screen, such as MG class unlocking Semi-auto rifles (allies MGers getting a G41 and Axis MGers getting an SVT???)
Upvote
0
What? A huge part of each team will still have these weapons...
What about you ruining the fun for everyone else by demanding absurd prototype weapons for everyone instead? Might as well go play a modern combat game if you want everyone to have assault rifles!
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Elite assault class seems like the only sensible solution for this problem. 2 for 64 players and 1 for 32 like someone already mentioned is a great way of implementing these weapons into the game while keeping it balanced at the same time.
Upvote
0
It's so funny that this is even an issue.
The number of assault rifles that will be allowed (unless there's something they're not yet telling us) will still be just a complete mess on every level. It makes no historical sense, no gameplay sense, and none of the players want it. This is no good for anybody who enjoys the game.
It's an absolute clear-cut, necessary decision to preserve the quality of the game that these weapons get dropped down to only one or possibly two per side. I never would have imagined something so hilariously, obviously bad would ever make it in the game, haha.
The number of assault rifles that will be allowed (unless there's something they're not yet telling us) will still be just a complete mess on every level. It makes no historical sense, no gameplay sense, and none of the players want it. This is no good for anybody who enjoys the game.
It's an absolute clear-cut, necessary decision to preserve the quality of the game that these weapons get dropped down to only one or possibly two per side. I never would have imagined something so hilariously, obviously bad would ever make it in the game, haha.
Upvote
0
Instead of the AKV, Allies should have gotten the SKS with attached grenade launcher.
Upvote
0
I would like to request an MG-15 in infantry configuration, please.
I think it would be fair, since the AVT40's recoil is realistically represented in game, that the PPSH get the same treatment (as the AVT has). The MKb.42 would be less of a terror if the weapons in similar classes opposing them were better represented. Take a look on Youtube at videos of people firing PPSH-41s and you find guys moving very little while firing from a standing position.
Upvote
0
I agree and would even say only one per team being the commander for example since he will stay back anyway. There should not be more than 1-2 automatic rifles per team regardless of server size. Assault will be seriously upgraded otherwise and the MP-40 downgraded which I would hate to see.
Why not make it different for realism servers or a server option to limit further?
But thanks Ramm it is a step into the right direction in my opinion...
Upvote
0
Well, I believe that's not gonna happen, as they'll need to add a new class, new unlocks, etc. Depending on their architecture, it might be a pain in the *** to add a new class at this point.
Another option would be to have a limited number of MKB in the assault class, so only the first few assault players would be able to pick MKB. But that will also depend on the architecture and might not be feasible at this point.
Upvote
0
Yeah, it needs to scale with the server size.
Or even better yet allow the server admins the capability to add as many numbers for every weapon as they would like for each. This way you can have your COD style game types, and realistic servers as well.
Or even better yet allow the server admins the capability to add as many numbers for every weapon as they would like for each. This way you can have your COD style game types, and realistic servers as well.
Upvote
0
I think the only reason they wont do this because cod kiddies will cry about the swat rifle being rare, and not buy RO3.
Upvote
0
Just remove the MP40 from assault class and put it in a new one - Dinosaur. we'll have MP40 toting Velociraptors. because I've played about 6 matches on 3 different servers today and for the life of me, I couldn't spot even one MP40.
it's going extinct.
it's going extinct.
Upvote
0
Sounds good!
I thought people were exaggerating, but when I hopped on a server and noticed how damn good it is, this is what happened
I thought people were exaggerating, but when I hopped on a server and noticed how damn good it is, this is what happened
Upvote
0
Still too many.
This is getting ridiculous...
Very disappointing.
This is getting ridiculous...
Seems like TWI changed their mind about that.
Very disappointing.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
They were originally, at least in interviews. Someone who's not as lazy as mean should track down exact quotes.
Upvote
0