Now in this thread some knuckleheads crap on RO!
http://www.forum.resistanceandliberation.com/showthread.php?t=7659
http://www.forum.resistanceandliberation.com/showthread.php?t=7659
Upvote
0
Resistance and Liberation Alpha - Patch OUT!
- Thread starter Pvt.pile
- Start date
One man's opinion and two or three others disagreed. No big deal and not worse than what you can read in this very thread including various "screw this POS" comments.
Upvote
0
Thanks, I'm sure everyone really appreciates that.
As for the mod, is there any news when the patch will be released?
Upvote
0
Needs more content tbh
And the draw distance needs sorting! Sick of shooting pale blue silhouettes all the time
And the draw distance needs sorting! Sick of shooting pale blue silhouettes all the time
Upvote
0
If they increased the draw distance the maps wouldn't run as smooth as they do now. Not everyone has an ueber rig .
.
Upvote
0
As of now, I have like 15 fps avgIf they increased the draw distance the maps wouldn't run as smooth as they do now. Not everyone has an ueber rig
I still think, despite the fact I woudln't be able to play it anymore, that the drawdistance should be upped for the sake of the mod...
Upvote
0
Seriously chaps invest in a better PC!
I get 60fps constant playing it and mine is VERY last gen!
I get 60fps constant playing it and mine is VERY last gen!
Upvote
0
It would help if they either changed the color of the fog or the color of the backdrop, or maybe both, so they match up better. This would let figures emerge out of the fog instead of letting them pop up as silluettes.
Upvote
0
I personally probably won't play the mod much until the first patch is released. Of course, it's nothing new to me, testing the game for a year or so. Of course, the game I had access to had a lot more map content than in the alpha demo (obviously).
The new additions I saw so far to the game for patch 1 are great so far. I hope they include some of the other maps as well -- they are basically done.
The new additions I saw so far to the game for patch 1 are great so far. I hope they include some of the other maps as well -- they are basically done.
Upvote
0
hey hockeywarrior,
During all these testing periods, did you never wonder why chest shots were not fatal ? Or was it changed recently ?
Monk.
During all these testing periods, did you never wonder why chest shots were not fatal ? Or was it changed recently ?
Monk.
Upvote
0
that exactly why dev's didnt realease the game before, and also didnt realease many videos and stuff, because people start *****ing about it, many dont seem to understand the words "under development". The game IS NOT finished, why even begin hoping that its bug free and has all of the content. Take ANY game in its starting stages and youll see the same thing. for example if you had played RO long before its been completed, you'd be dissapointed also
Upvote
0
Of course. Does that mean we should praise it for what it does not offer? Or should we only praise it for what it does offer and ignore the problems in it? Or should we all shut up about the game completely?
Criticism were it's due and credit were it's due. If a release (!) is crap (which RnL isn't!) then people have every right to complain about it. If there is a new release this will be evaluated too, as will the releases after that until we reach the final version.
If it's still in development the devs shouldn't have a hard time ignoring posts about stuff they already fixed for the next releases or stuff that is already planned for some time later on. We as users can't know about that stuff. We can only describe what we see, and that's what we are doing.
If the devs can't live with that they shouldn't release stuff. Period.
Simply labeling it "alpha release", which is a contradiction in and off itself, but release cycle naming conventions work a little different in the modding world anyway, won't magically make the bugs go away. They are there so people can ***** about them.
Criticism were it's due and credit were it's due. If a release (!) is crap (which RnL isn't!) then people have every right to complain about it. If there is a new release this will be evaluated too, as will the releases after that until we reach the final version.
If it's still in development the devs shouldn't have a hard time ignoring posts about stuff they already fixed for the next releases or stuff that is already planned for some time later on. We as users can't know about that stuff. We can only describe what we see, and that's what we are doing.
If the devs can't live with that they shouldn't release stuff. Period.
Simply labeling it "alpha release", which is a contradiction in and off itself, but release cycle naming conventions work a little different in the modding world anyway, won't magically make the bugs go away. They are there so people can ***** about them.
Upvote
0
no, you definetly dont need to praise it. Im not talking about people discussing about bugs and such, but people who just ***** about the game, as not understanding that its a WIP. People have a false hope that an alpha realease should be all perfect, then they come into forums and start throwing **** around asking why is this and that crap. Constructive and intelligent criticism is always welcome, but not mindless yabbing
Upvote
0
I find your arguments lacking it is like showing me a retarded baby and then you want to try make me believe it will be a professor one day ...
Even a alpha release can iron out the most obivious bugs and flaws what the RnL team did with this release but I don't see how the realism part will work ...
Just as an example it is a pain in the *** to shoot someone (which is the death sentence to a FPS imo)
Even a alpha release can iron out the most obivious bugs and flaws what the RnL team did with this release but I don't see how the realism part will work ...
Just as an example it is a pain in the *** to shoot someone (which is the death sentence to a FPS imo)
Upvote
0