Looks like MW3...
I kinda doubt that a boring debut trailer where you just see soldiers reading a book in the baracks would attract much publicity. Generating publicity was obviously the point of this trailer that's why theres much action going on. I see your point @over the top action but well what do you expect, it's not a simulation or anything. As for the multiplayer, it probably won't be a failure with DICE developing it.It's not just the setting, literally everything looks exactly like MW2. The animations, the over-the-top action, the animations, the special forces theme, the cutscenes, the many explosions, the weapons, the movement mechanics... I could go on and on. It's a carbon copy of MW2. The singleplayer looks pretty good in a shooter-on-rails kinds of way, but if they also copied MW2's multiplayer (no dedicated servers, P2P etc), this game will be a failure. If it doesn't, its multiplayer will be superior to MW2's. We'll see.
Apparently, only half-finished bug ridden barely playable "realism" games can be considered good in this forum.
Apparently, only half-finished bug ridden barely playable "realism" games can be considered good in this forum.
Is like judging a book by it's cover.Judgeing games from trailers
It's not just the setting, literally everything looks exactly like MW2. The animations, the over-the-top action, the animations, the special forces theme, the cutscenes, the many explosions, the weapons, the movement mechanics... I could go on and on. It's a carbon copy of MW2. The singleplayer looks pretty good in a shooter-on-rails kinds of way, but if they also copied MW2's multiplayer (no dedicated servers, P2P etc), this game will be a failure. If it doesn't, its multiplayer will be superior to MW2's. We'll see.
I've really only played Medal of Honor Airborne, and there were no crazy action scenes it that.