For it , is necessary to make an opportunity of indirect fire. It is the tool of support of infantry.
It supported them with direct fire.
Upvote
0
For it , is necessary to make an opportunity of indirect fire. It is the tool of support of infantry.
By the rust I assume you are refering to the weathering on the side of the superstructure?
That is actually dirt collected on the side of the tank ( or atleast, I tried to make it look that way ). Similiar to this photo:
I'll change it a little to make it seem more like dirt rather then rust.
Also, the eagle stamp on the rear crates is too small to make out a swastika or not.
Thanks for the heads up guys!
only the barrel is different from the stug3, so you would have limited work to convert them
Sorry, I'm going to be pedantic about it.not entirely true, the stugIII was still employed by the sturmabteilungen in a ratio of 3/1 next to the Stuh's, but as mentioned the stugIII were employed in an AT role more often than not and they needed infantry support aswell. taking a 105mm howitzer was just following the trend of upgrading firepower to make up for the loss in numbers the germans had to face towards the end.
No, you're right, in my opinion - vanilla RO tanks don't have all those little details: scratches, dirty spots etc. That Stug's texture is really something! I would be really glad if TWI had hired Captain Obvious!Absolutely great work. To me it looks like it will not fit in very well with the stock RO vehicles though. It looks as if it has a different texture style than stock RO vehicles. A good and more realistic one that is. Ah maybe that's just me seeing things.
Offtopic: Why was Heinz banned?
Hey guys,
I'm very sorry for the lack of updates. Yes I am still working on the StuG! The reason for the lack of activity in this project is because I've been busy working with the CC and DH mods. I want to help out the mods before I work on the StuG so that they could be release to the public a little faster.