Ep2 was much better. When the guy lifted the MG with his bare hands to go save his buddies on the other line, it was awesome . . kekekekekekekek 5ft high pile of squinty eyed folk!!
Upvote
0
While I do agree with some of your points which I think I mentioned in my original post. I have to respectfully stay true to my original thought.
Of course historical accuracy is important, lets just call it human error. I just feel very strongly about the story. I don't understand how one could not connect to the emotions of a scene and gain a little insight to the thoughts and feelings of both the man being shot and the one shooting because it wasn't the right weapon of the era.
Similarily, the scene where he got the nickname peaches, What if someone said well, it was actually banana's. Does that mean the scene doesn't get the point across now and we can't understand how they connected with each other?
with respect
Ep2 was much better. When the guy lifted the MG with his bare hands to go save his buddies on the other line, it was awesome . . kekekekekekekek 5ft high pile of squinty eyed folk!!
I get your point but for many of us, we like to believe we're actually peering into 1942 or whatever the year to come may be. We get entranced in what we're seeing and expect everything to be accurate to what we know should have been there. When you see something out of place, blatant or otherwise, it jars you out of that experience. I think if you start making excuses or drop your expectations for a film it loses its value. Many of us are going into this with certain expectations having read the books, studied the subject material, etc. It's harder to make excuses when you're expecting accuracy.
Also, as I said, one of the points of The Pacific is to show what truly happened. In the same way that the History channel makes sure the details are correct for their programs, The Pacific is also striving to do the same. To do otherwise would, as already said, show lack of attention to detail which would bring down the quality of the film, and it would be a disregard to the educational aspect. Of course, if we were discussing Windtalkers, then it'd be completely different. The purpose of that movie was mostly to show cool action. The Pacific is about showing cool action but its also about showing people what that Greatest Generation went through, and about how the war actually played out, hence historical accuracy plays an important role.
episode 2 makes one step forward, episode 3 takes four steps back.
thanks HBO for yet again ruining something that had potential by forcing crappy "drama" episodes. sure sex sells, but blood, guts and war sells better. enough with the cheap grade C porn and go back to having people killing each other
BlackLabel said:Emo episode...i write this off as intermidate episode till the series picks up pace again...
Only thing is the actor who plays Leckie. He looks real cool but I can't help feeling awkward every time he shows up on screen.
I agree, he looks too "nice guyish" or naive. I'm reading his book right now and the guy was a trouble maker, in and out of the brig, dodging MPs on liberty and drinking and screwing every chance he gets. Not saying that's a bad thing, but the actor just doesn't give him that image in my opinion.
I liked this weeks episode, though I still feel that the series is lacking due to the absence of a 'Currahee' esq episode to really build the characters up.
episode 2 makes one step forward, episode 3 takes four steps back.
thanks HBO for yet again ruining something that had potential by forcing crappy "drama" episodes. sure sex sells, but blood, guts and war sells better. enough with the cheap grade C porn and go back to having people killing each other
Emo episode...i write this off as intermidate episode till the series picks up pace again...