PC Specs and FPS Results or Approximations

[LegTaste]

i7 clocked at 3.8 i think
gtx 260 (older version)
4gb ddr3 ram clocked at around 1200ish

Game runs perfectly fine, i think everything is set to high at the moment, dont know the fps, but it runs far smoother than i would expect an fps of 30 to be

 

[HoboWithAGlock]

Windows 7 64bit
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black (quad core at 3.4ghz)
nVidia GTX 285 1GB
4gb DDR3 RAM (I forget the speed, tbh)

I am running the game at max (custom max) settings at a smooth 60fps+ with no problems at all.

 

[hellcat420]

windows xp 32bit
pentium d 940(3.2ghz per core)
3gig ddr3 ram
nvidia 9800gt 512mb

ive had no problems so far running on low and medium graphics.

 

[illscarlettNP]

I would love to hear from someone with 2x 5770's CF.

I am away from home, so I can not play the beta yet, but I am wondering how it will run with:

Intel X58 mobo
2x 5770's CF
I7 950 3.3 Ghz
6GB 1333Mhz

Thanks in advance!

 

[Poliwhirl]

i7 950 @ 3.06GHz
4GB Dominator GT DDR3 ram
2 x 460 GTX OC edition sli
Windows 7 64 bit

Cant give an approximate fps but id say over 60 everything on ultra and highest settings. No issues here.

 

[LaseRad]

AMD Phenom II X4 955 clocked to 4.0Ghz
Radeon HD 6970
8 GB DDR3
Windows 7 x64
1920 x 1080

Getting solid 60 fps (vsync) with everything maxed out except shadows which are set to low. Sometimes when there is a lot of action the framerate drops to 20-30 but it recovers quickly afterwards.

ye.. i have a similar config and the result is identical... low shadows, the rest to the max or all boxes checked incl vsync.. result is mostly stable 50-60 .. there are drops though
to complete my pc config... Q9400 @ 3.4 and 4gb ram, same os, resolution a little lower 1600x900

 

[Oook!]

i7 2600k
ATI 6970
8gb corsair dominator(forget the exact spec)
Crucial M4 256gb SSD(not that this should be hugely relevant)
Windows 7 64bit SP1

I was getting between 30 and 50 FPS on Ultra on a 64 player earlier.

 

[azianinvazn]

win7 64bit
phenom2 3.3
gtx 570
4gb ddr3

around 30-50fps on ultra

 

[BL4Z3>FAS>]

the tank map seems really harsh for me with 25-30 fps on medium settings

ASUS CROSSHAIR V FORMULA REPUBLIC OF GAMERS EDITION MOTHERBOARD
AMD PHENOM-II X4 975 3.6GHz BLACK EDITION CPU
ASUS HD 6950 2GB DDR5 VIDEO CARD
PATRIOT 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz LOW LATENCY KIT
CREATIVE X-FI PRO TITANIUM FATALITY EDITION SOUND CARD
ASUS VE28 24" LED MONITOR
COOLERMASTER HAF 932 CASE BLACK EDITION
Logitech X-530 5.1 Surround System
Razer Diamondback Mouse

 

[TheExodu5]

i5 2500k @ 4.6GHz
2x GTX 570 (stock)
8GB DDR3
Windows 7 64-bit

50-90fps @ 1080p, max settings

 

[Yarden]

System:
Windows 7 64 Bit
Q6600 3.0GHz
GTX 285, Overclocked
4GB DDR2 Ram

Game Settings: A mix of Low/Med
Experience: Runs ok at those settings. If there is smoke, the frames are going under 20.
Can't understand why I have to run it with those settings

Resolution is 1680x1050 (16:10).

Cleaning my PC atm... defrag etc..

Q6600 2.4GHZ
4770HD
4gb ram

and runs pretty good on med-high settings, 16:9 res

so i dont know what is wrong with your CPU.

 

[Yarden]

System:
Windows 7 64 Bit
Q6600 3.0GHz
GTX 285, Overclocked
4GB DDR2 Ram

Game Settings: A mix of Low/Med
Experience: Runs ok at those settings. If there is smoke, the frames are going under 20.
Can't understand why I have to run it with those settings

Resolution is 1680x1050 (16:10).

Cleaning my PC atm... defrag etc..

Q6600 2.4GHZ
4770HD
4GBRAM

runs on mid-high and 16:9 res pretty smooth.

so weird you can only run it on low.

 

[Yarden]

System:
Windows 7 64 Bit
Q6600 3.0GHz
GTX 285, Overclocked
4GB DDR2 Ram

Game Settings: A mix of Low/Med
Experience: Runs ok at those settings. If there is smoke, the frames are going under 20.
Can't understand why I have to run it with those settings

Resolution is 1680x1050 (16:10).

Cleaning my PC atm... defrag etc..

Q6600 2.4GHZ
4770HD
4GBRAM

runs on mid-high and on 16:9 res pretty smooth.

so weird you can only run it on low.

 

[brutal99]

Consider yourselves lucky;
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz
8GB Ram
ATI Radeon 4850

on lowest settings with 1920x1080 5-10 fps at best..

 

[[DH]Chris89]

Computer Spec:
AMD Phenom II 965 X4 Oced to 3.7ghz
Gigabyte 890FXA-UD5 (Rev 2)
Corsair Vengance 1600mhz (9-9-9-24 Timings) 8GB
HD 4870 1GB Ram each, Two in crossfire
Windows 7 64bit

Game settings:

Resolution: 1920x1200
Post Processing: Normal
V-Sync: Off

Detail Mode, Texture Quality: Ultra
Character Detail, FX Quality, Post Processing, Lighting Quality, Foliage Quality: High

Shadow Quality: Medium

AA: FSAA Low

Light Shafts, Ambient Occlusion, Framerate Smoother, On Frame thread lag all on

Bloom and Motion Blur: Off

Runs around 50 to 30 frames a second what is very good considering my graphics cards arn't 'Recommended'

 

[Moyako]

C2D [email protected]
2x2GB DDRII 1066 Fatal1ty
GTX260 core 216 SC
SB Audigy
Windows 7 x64
Res 1440 x 900

Everything high, and it's running pretty well. No complains so far

 

[Filo90]

i5 2500k 3.3ghz
gtx 570
4gb ram
windows 7 64bit

around 40 on 1920x1080 ultra except DOF, Bloom and Motion Blur, I think this config should "eat" this game, we need optimization here

 

[2feathers]

wow, this thread is really disconcerting. I didn't think this game would need such high system specs. I thought I'd be fine with a 216 core 260 gtx with everything on high. It seems like people with better pc's then me are getting really bad frame rates. anything under 60 fps is unplayable for me. Damn, looks like I have to upgrade my GPU. Unless the beta is unoptimized or something.

 

[funymunky]

2.66 Quad Core
4 GB Ram
1 GB GTS 450

Playing on all Ultra (shadows on high) with ambient occlusion, motion blur, and depth of field off, 1360x768. V-Sync off. Usually get around 40-50 fps, sometimes drops to ~30, but rarely. Overall, runs and looks great.

 

[Graphic]

C2D [email protected]
2x2GB DDRII 1066 Fatal1ty
GTX260 core 216 SC
SB Audigy
Windows 7 x64
Res 1440 x 900

Everything high, and it's running pretty well. No complains so far

OK this is great.

I have one less gig of ram, exact same GPU, my dual core is 200 mhz slower...not quite as good but close enough. This pretty much erased all my worries about performance. +1!