Realism id

[D3terioNation]

Yes we agree! Its never gonna happen lol

 

[Russkie11]

Save them? I usually end up shooting them in the face. Especially that asian guy. He always looks at me funny.

There's also civilians in AA like in the SF map Hospital. It's an ROE violation if you shoot, them but I do anyway. I hate that cowering nurse. I'm like "Don't you know who I am? I'm tha Juggernaut, *****!" *pop, pop, pop, Leavenworth*

omg lol. Thats the funniest thing ive heard all day. THA JUGGAHNAUT *****!!!!

Anyway, i like the idea. I know it may be controversial, so maybe make it an official turnoffable mod, like a mutator?

 

[Pycckuu]

I'd say to make it less contravercial, they could start by adding dead civilians or dead people in general.

 

[Capt.Marion]

It would probably end up with ppl screaming CIVVIE CAMPING! or NURSE CAMPING!, just like in AA

 

[Carazor]

It would probably end up with ppl screaming CIVVIE CAMPING! or NURSE CAMPING!, just like in AA

The game sure has degraded since I left (LOL)

IMO, civilians are a bad idea. It just is too hard to implement correctly, then have everyone online follow the rules and not shoot them (unless they shoot you first) and of course, you can an annoying idiot (no offense meant to anyone, don't flame me please) running around gunning them down for cheap laughs.

AFAIK, Russian partisans who opposed the Communist rule shot the Russians too, as well as fight the Germans.

 

[CCCP]

I think adding Civilianse would be very realistic and ALL in ALL Great Idea!
Also Domestic animals ( I'm serious)

 

[Swede]

When I suggested this id

 

[Desantnik]

Holy ****...when did the forums get overran with 12 year olds using the world realistic as justification for every little idea they saw or read about?

 

[Deathsai]

Holy ****...when did the forums get overran with 12 year olds using the world realistic as justification for every little idea they saw or read about?

You know, if you go to any major Call of Duty forum, there will be tons of CODlings who say that Call of Duty is a realistic representation of World War II.

If you think this is bad...

 

[SgtH3nry3]

When I suggested this id

 

[Carazor]

You know, if you go to any major Call of Duty forum, there will be tons of CODlings who say that Call of Duty is a realistic representation of World War II.

If you think this is bad...

This is a fairly big problem these days...big-budget products look cool and play like a war movie, and all the kiddies think since they look so 'real' they must be 'realistic'!

 

[veryhungryhobo]

No, all the civillians evacuated or lived in their basements during the battles.

BUT what about saving private ryan there was a family and disiel died and the sniper and pow..........there were people the movie says so,

 

[Someguy]

I wouldn't mind seeing a group of 'static' people cowering in a attic or such as long as nothing happened when you shot them, people would become bored and it'd become and imersion thing.

 

[gonzman]

All you blokes who want civilians in game (especially the freaks who want them shootable, double especially the freaks who wants kids and elderly people) need to get your heads checked for major mental problems you bunch of screwed up idiots.

Good lord, realism is one thing, but that is sick, and not welcome in any game, Even the GTA series which managed to get its self banned from most places at some stage didn't allow you to kill children.

 

[Nimsky]

What's so sick about it? America's Army has civilians in them, and nobody minds them. I forgot what happened if you shoot them though. But for RO, they're not really needed.

 

[gonzman]

The fact that world war 2 has very strong connections to deaths of MILLIONS of INNOCENT civilians is enough to warrant putting it off in any WW2 based game, It's a bad enough fact it ever happened in its many forms during WW2 it's sick to even consider the idea of having murderable civilians in Red Orchestra.

 

[Harry S. Truman]

Do you want a murder, rape, pillage and abuse feature too?

All were very common on the Eastern front....


I think this is best left out of the game.

 

[BuddyLee]

I don't know about Europe, but in every single War ever fought on American Soil Civilians picked up rifles and joined the fight. But I think this is more of a custom skin type thing where on some of the city maps players skins could be half civilian half piece-meal combat equipment. I don't think that civilian bots is going to improve gameplay.

Maybe if there were consequences for killing civilian, but we all know that immature players [myself included sometimes] would shoot civ-bots for kicks...or if they wouldn't get the heck outa my way.

I like the Idea of K9-Units, the Dogs' Master could sick his 'Best Friend' on His worst enemy.

 

[jedinstven-o crni Wuk]

Holy ****...when did the forums get overran with 12 year olds using the world realistic as justification for every little idea they saw or read about?

pfff ... when you say that it sounds like it woud be first a problem since now

 

[The_Countess]

now i dont know about you but i was a civilian, in a full scale ingagement, id get the HELL out of there.

when there is a much fighting going on as in the avarige RO: O map i dont think you'd see a whole lot of civilians during the fighting. they've have fled the general area long befor the fireright got up to that level.

so all in all, no civilians on the map is perfectly realistic.