We need better AT weapons...

[luciferintears]

Well it gets very Irritating when people ask the same thing over and over again. If you just search the word "Panzerfaust" in google you would learn.

Forgive me for not having the vast ww2 knowledge like that which you posses.

If it's not too much trouble, and i am not interfering with any breakthrough historical work you're doing at the moment (for i do not wish waste your time by having you spend a whole 30sec typing up an answer), could you please pass on some of you're knowledge to me?

Were k98 rifle grenades available at the time of stalingrad? Because that would seem like a viable alternative as an anti-infantry weapon instead of the panzerfaust (which i now know did not exist in stalingrad).

 

[Scarf Ace]

I can take out T34's quite effectively with a PTRS, I've got more trouble with Panzers IVs however.
Fun fact: If the T34's driver's hatch is open, shoot at the driver. Your bullet will splatter his brains all over, completely ruin the interior and probably blow something up.

 

[Field Marshal Rommel]

there's no way an ATR would penetrate a pz4's frontal armor at 200m.

If that is happening in game then the ATR needs serious revision.

 

[grothesj2]

I support the addition of AT gun emplacements for some maps. Remember, the battle wasn't just inside the city. The advance to the city and then, the surrounding and reduction of the pocket would certainly involve AT guns.

 

[Flanker15]

They've already modelled the AT guns for both sides as static scenery, getting them working is half finished already.

 

[Movingtarget]

could at guns be added as a pesudo tank? it could have an ai crew with a human commander and could be moved manualy by said crew when it needs to reposition.