Then they shouldn't advertise 'a branching campaign full of twists', 'Advaned AI', 'Dynamic Conversation System' etc. on the back of the cover.
They didn't screw up the franchise at all, they make millions of dollars more than they made before and the games, at least Vegas 1, were still enjoyable. I'm the first person who would support an oldschool Ravenshield 2, but all the whiners just really go on my nerves, seriously get over yourselves already(not counting you particularly). If you don't like it then, well, nobody's asking you to stay (a fan of the series). You are a customer and not more, you don't have the right to decide anything about the franchise. If you don't like it, then don't buy it. If enough people think+act the same way, then there will be change. If that's not the case then your a small minority and as such you simply have BAD LUCK. Again I'd love an oldschool R6, but seeing how childish some people act makes me shake my head.
No, I don't agree that the series became crap though Lockdown must've been crap from what I heard(didn't play it though) and I didn't really like Vegas 2's SP. It's something new. I only said that I'd still love to see an oldschool R6 as well. One game must not exclude the other. And of course everyone can voice their opinion. But besides the fact that it's simply annoying as hell to have the same old discussions over and over again with one side whining how everything was better in the old days, it is NOT valid to believe that opinion of Person A is worth as much as person B's opinion, if Person A did not even play the game, yet thinks he can perfectly judge a game.I'm not really following you... are you saying that you do agree that the R6 series went down the ****ter, but that people don't have the right to leave such comments when a R6: Vegas thread pops up? Why? They have just as much the right to post their opinion as anyone else.
It doesn't matter, it says so on the box but doesn't deliver at all(even after the patches). The thing is that ArmA2 is the perfect example to show how many people on this forums have double standards. ArmA2 doesn't deliver on half of it's promises(on the box), yet nobody of you guys complains because it's such a nice simulation. Any other game however automatically gets condemned.As for the text on the ArmA 2 box art, does anyone really take such marketing text seriously? I did like the campaign. It's open-ended and portrays a political situation in a much more realistic way than most games do. But before the patches came out, it had its fair share of fps-dips, true... but if you didn't buy it for the MP or the editor you really should have known better. Anyone who's slightly familiar with the ArmA series knows that it's all about the organized co-op. In fact, I've mentioned that many times in the ArmA 2 thread.
But this isn't that thread, so...
Again, you don't get to define what R6 is. And on my Vegas 2 box(I don't own the first one anymore) it says three things: 1) Advanced Cover System -> works perfectly fine, and that's one of the main things Vegas is known for, the cover system 2) Play the coop campaign, or in competetive modes with up to 15 players -> possible and enjoyable as well as some other ppl here stated, 3)create your own individual character -> that was quite awesome actually because you had 495893 different camo/armor stuff, 4)gain new weapons etc. through achievements in both SP/Mp -> worked out fine, even though it was kinda inappropriate in SP imo.I like how you expect the stuff that's written on the ArmA 2 box, yet at the same time are perfectly fine with Rainbow Six: Vegas not being a true Rainbow Six game.
Hey, it says Rainbow Six on the box too right?
This isn't meant as an attack on you, but I honestly think that if you thought Vegas was a good game you would have liked Lockdown too.No, I don't agree that the series became crap though Lockdown must've been crap from what I heard(didn't play it though)
Lockdown, apart from looking very bland, simply took the tactical possibilities away from you while not "making up for it" with what Vegas offered. It was kind of the worst from both worlds.
Well from what I remember the presentation sucked(which is definitely Vegas' strongpoint), graphic looked xbox1-like, AI must've been extremely dumb and levels extremely linear. That's what I vaguely remember from reviews, but it's a long time ago already.