What bothers me is not your opposing views but the fact that, even after more than 15 courteous replies from RO fans explaining what RO is all about and why certain cookie-cutter FPS features don't belong in the game, you STILL refuse to understand. Either that, or you don't read any of our posts. You even have the nerve to call us "sim-nuts who represent nothing and flame everything and everyone". No wonder your reputation says 'Knighted sucks'.
Like I said, I'm all for welcoming new guys, but at least try to understand what Red Orchestra is about before criticizing something you know nothing about. At least wahoo4 is going to try RO:O, which is admirable.
Although RO has changed a lot over the years, especially RO2 will improve in many different ways, it's still the same concept; a realism-based Eastern Front first person shooter. Not sim-level, but still realistic. It has been since the release of the very first mod version in 2003. RO is RO is RO. If you can't accept that, why are you even here? Do you see me posting on the CoD forums urging the devs to get rid of the crosshairs, regenerative health, one-man-army gameplay and peashooting guns? Because that's what you're doing, except you turn it around and urge TWI to turn RO into another thirteen-in-a-dozen CoD clone.
I'm not buying your notion that it would increase TWI's number of customers either. If anything, they'd lose customers, especially the loyal fans who have been playing RO since the release of Ostfront or even since the mod days.
No offense, but judging your inability to accept other views, you are very closed-minded.