You've developed something known as kissingtripwire'sasssyndrome
....
Upvote
0
You've developed something known as kissingtripwire'sasssyndrome
Somewhat rare yes when compared to other guns because unlike other guns the Ge-41 used machined parts which were hard to mass produce but they werent nonexistant there are plenty of ww2 pictures with soliders using Gewehr-41s.Well well i think you just got all those people who thought RO was a realism game down there, Yoshi.
Then again you might open some peoples eyes.
p.s Even a dev has said that it "was somewhat rare", kind of knocks down the " but plenty were produced" argument doesnt it?
....
Well well i think you just got all those people who thought RO was a realism game down there, Yoshi.
Then again you might open some peoples eyes.
p.s Even a dev has said that it "was somewhat rare", kind of knocks down the " but plenty were produced" argument doesnt it?
ro really is a piece of **** right now, fortunately i just started a full time job and am in the process of buying every WW2 rifle so I can play some Reality Orchestra at the gun range.
Good day, ****ing wankas
Till then, your attitude ****s, and you have yet to make any valid points. Please come back when you have a valid reason to be pissed, and can describe accurately what it is that has you so.
Hearts n' love
As long as they were used in significant numbers in any one battle, we have no problem with adding a weapon. I just used the term "somwhat rare" as others where using it and I forgot my sarcasim tags it seems. My own personal opinion on the matter is over 100k produced is more then enough. If you have a problem with that Jono, so be it. Nothing I say or do will change your mind. I can only assume you would rather us change the weapons to be unrealistic for balance then.
I am changing my first post to reflect this.
In real life the recoil on a G41 is a lot less than the G/K43. The 41 gives you a nice smooth nudge on your shoulder. It smoothly cycles back and locks forward again, neatly depositing the spent case about 12 feet to the right.
The 43 thwacks you in the shoulder. It makes a lot of racket as it clatters back and slams forward again. If you're lucky it drops the brass in the same timezone without mutilating it.
I love the G43 in real life, but the G41 really is the Cadillac of German firearms. Finicky, but damn smooth.
Jono, you're stacking the deck here. I can present an equally leading question in the other direction. For example:
"So, you're saying that if one side used a fully functional weapon in a battle, that was produced in amounts of over 100,000, that adds balance to the maps, and exists in fronts where we ALREADY have a wide variety of the standard issue weapons, you'd tell the devs 'Don't make it -- it's too rare.'?"
Or, I can ask an even more pointed question. "Are you saying you don't want the maps to be balanced? You want them to favor one side in particular when we have a perfectly workable weapon that could easily balance the maps out?"
See? Stacking the deck goes both ways.
I'd like to say when ArmedAssault is released and i'll need to make room on my comp, RO will be the game to go if it carries on in what i think to be an unrealistic, gameplay first FPS.
So you're saying that if one side used quite a lot of faulty paintball guns in a battle on a whole front where a wide variety of other properly mass produced stable weapons were produced...you would implement them?
And err ( i honestly don't know, im not being sarcastic) what battle were the G41 used in significant numbers?