Instead of offering some DLC weapons that some people are not willing to pay for, you can open donations for the development of the game. I would rather pay for a donation rather than paying for a weapon that I know that is not helpful in gameplay for me.
For example the gunslinger has enough weapons and I don't need the Glock 18c, the same case goes with the demolitionist, it has so many weapons that The blunderbuss is not more useful than the seeker 6 or the seal squeal or the RPG-7. The Commando has a lot of weapons in his arsenal and he already has a light machine gun so he knew minigun might bring a change but the weapons that he has are enough. Mosin nagant doesn't do more damage than the railgun, AMR, compound bow and has a lot of spread for some reason. There are other DLC weapons that are useful but these aren't ( at least to me)
That's why opening donations for the game would get it more money than these DLCs as I imagine not a lot of people buy them
For example the gunslinger has enough weapons and I don't need the Glock 18c, the same case goes with the demolitionist, it has so many weapons that The blunderbuss is not more useful than the seeker 6 or the seal squeal or the RPG-7. The Commando has a lot of weapons in his arsenal and he already has a light machine gun so he knew minigun might bring a change but the weapons that he has are enough. Mosin nagant doesn't do more damage than the railgun, AMR, compound bow and has a lot of spread for some reason. There are other DLC weapons that are useful but these aren't ( at least to me)
That's why opening donations for the game would get it more money than these DLCs as I imagine not a lot of people buy them