I don't think anybody will ever do this.so a little dot on the screen would work just fine too if it's really too big a problem.
Upvote
0
I don't think anybody will ever do this.so a little dot on the screen would work just fine too if it's really too big a problem.
His point is valid and we all have acknowledged or understood that. It still doesn't really change the fact that once you bring up that argument it also implies you're willingly opening can of worms for similiar arguments, E.G. RO2 is dumbed down because it features anachronistic post war entrenchment tools, because not only it allows unrealistic and physically impossible gear placement (this is visible in any screenshot where you can see field gear beter) it's unauthentic. Similiarly unless you were shooting under 10 yard range the ironsights there's no point to have ironsights 'aligned' like that, but that's the case in BC2.
We could start digging up all sorts of examples about authencity or accuracy, which results to the biggest reason why people have leaned towards the point that the game is not really meant to be that realistic. How about field gear seen in BC2 that looks more like they saw a picture of field repaired gear and artistically pulled everything else out of their arse than model it credibly after real piece of gear? It's inaccurate and unrealistic (and unauthentic aswell), same applies for the silly ironsights. Where do you want to draw the line?
It just doesn't make sense and after you get through a certain amount of posts without understanding that then it appears as if you're trolling. The forum isn't against dissenting opinions, but it is however against nonsensical, repetitive, opinions.
I think you just labeled me as nonsensical, repetitive and a troll indirectly trough quoting another persons opinion, despite the fact that I earlier suggested a stop on this matter.
Omar The Insurgent said:Just because you and some other people seem to not mind something that is, from my perspective, a HUGE set back in gaming industry does not make it forgivable.
Omar the Insurgent said:Just because the Vietnam addon is so cheap, minor, insignificant and does not strive for authenticity does not mean I won't react if developers choose to dumb down the sequels(expansions, addons, DLC's or real sequels).
Omar the Insurgent said:Next time you critic some other FPS for lack of realism just remember that you made a contribution in the past.
Omar the Insurgent said:And as far as BC2 realism goes, we will see how comparable will ROHOS sound department will be to it.
What is the point of saying stop if you're going to keep responding?
Amerikaner said:ROHOS will be recording actual weapon sounds and such. BC2 just wants them to sound badass.
You can't really expect me to stop after being attributed as a repetitive troll.
While I do have confidence in Tripwire's sound departement(as in all other departements) just recording sound from real weapons is not enough(which is probably not ONLY thing they will do for weapon sounds). I think that in BC2 speed of sound is simulated and also there are many echo's, cracks and what not. So its not a simple WAV that is badass.
Eh.. having fired the MG3 in real life I think no such ammo box exists or would work with the MG3. The shells are ejected downwards and thus this box would jam up the gun after a single burst.BC2 MG3 - skip to 0:40 sec:
YouTube - Bad Company 2: MG-3 Audio is Amazing!
So much for the incredible realism that BC2 had before that darn addon.
Indeed. Rage lvl Red