and ironically they balanced it by the ppsh shooting EVERYTHING to buggary at 10m where you could use the mp40 to snipe at least across the square in zhitomir...
Except for the low-fps zero recoil bug =)
Upvote
0
and ironically they balanced it by the ppsh shooting EVERYTHING to buggary at 10m where you could use the mp40 to snipe at least across the square in zhitomir...
Show me a link of where you found this out^^ please!The 71 round mag for the PPsh will be an upgrade, you won't start with it.
That wouldn't be authentic, because the PPsh-41 has an standard drum magazine with 71 rounds or a clip with only 35 rounds (like the PPS-43)
I wonder what "lmg.42" refers to?^^
So exactly.....how much is the umpteenth time is real world numbers again....Admit it it's not even a bloody word...it's a colloquialismOh, and for the umpteenth time:
It's just that this scan has been posted at last 20+ times on this board and people still go on and ask if the MG 42 was in Stalingrad.So exactly.....how much is the umpteenth time is real world numbers again....Admit it it's not even a bloody word...it's a colloquialism
The MG42 was in Stalingrad in limited numbers.
Heck, by now I think everybody would've seen that unit weapons report from late 1942. I don't have it, so could anyone post it please (for the umpteenth time)?
I've got no clue, but it was quite effective against tanks with a penetration of up to 120mm @ 100m @ 90Why this wide use of 4,2cm Pak?
No. This:You mean this?
No. This:
Now find the paper that mentions the MKb 42 in Stalingrad.
hmm the eternal question: lock the thread due to spamming of the form, or sticky it so people won't ask this silly question again?
I see what you did there.No, obviously he meant this one:
That would be something, wouldn't it?