My screen has 1310720 pixels while yours only has 1044480 pixels. So in short: My 19" LCD display > Your 27" Samsung "HD"TV
I use an Apple 30 monitor. I just bought a Sony Bravia 46" 1080P. Will tell you how it looks in a couple of days. It should be fine.
I am not yet convinced about wide screen, it still hasn't got great support from new games, and I like the height of a normal 4:3 19" screen which means I'd have to go for a very expensive 24" + model...
I am not yet convinced about wide screen, it still hasn't got great support from new games, and I like the height of a normal 4:3 19" screen which means I'd have to go for a very expensive 24" + model...
I'll probably wait till the prices drop next year, as I am very happy with my new 19" Viewsonic with its almight 3ms response time.
I wonder what kind of fps I would get if I used my screen to its limits.
I have a P4 3.2 with 1 gig ram, a 6800GS and an X-fi soundboard.
My monitor is a 24" Sony CRT. What is a good tradeoff between a nice resolution and good fps?
Ouch!I used corel draw and 1400x900 is pretty much equal to 1280x1024. that is one has the same ammount as the other one just hangs over on top and one hangs over on the sides.
1400+900=2300
1280+1024=2304
the ratio of your answer should be the same as my answer
Easy does not necessarily mean mathematically correct.I just put the lowest common denominator its easier to compare.
Huh?either way one resolution lets in only 4 pixels extra along one side.
Logic dictates that, given the same pixel count, if the diameter is larger on one model compared to the other, the pixels themselves have to be bigger.Excuse me but I would like to ask, if I ran at 1360x768 on a 27" wide screen and on another that measured 24", which would give a crisper/clearer image, or would they both have exactly the same definition !
As far as the eye could see...
Running 1680 x 1050 and it looks absolutely fine. The stretching is probably there but I can't say I notice it too much.