I had lots of fun with Crysis because of all the options you have to solving the objectives(aside from some linear points), and the graphics were a showcase of what the PC could do. That's why this is just stupid. I mean seriously, DX9 only? 12 Players max in MP? Crysis had DX10 and 32(or was it even 64, idk) players. I'm not saying that the game might not be fun or still pretty in the end on PC, but I'm not buying this out of principle because it's a perfect negative example.
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/be-the-crysis-2/708600
so not going to buy this. it just shouts "oh hey, i was dumbed down for consoles and my graphics are worse than those of my predecessor and dx9 only due to console limitations and cryteks' laziness"
[url]http://www.gametrailers.com/video/be-the-crysis-2/708600[/URL]
so not going to buy this. it just shouts "oh hey, i was dumbed down for consoles and my graphics are worse than those of my predecessor and dx9 only due to console limitations and cryteks' laziness"
No it's cryengine 3, which was built with consoles in mind first. Even if it has the same graphical quality as Crysis 1 in the end, it's still not a step forward like it should be.
You completely miss the point. Besides I doubt that it will run any better than Crysis 1. Or maybe a bit because of the city environment but even if that was the case it wouldn't have nothing to do with optimization.Yeah. How dare developers optimizing engines for non-high end equipment!
. Or maybe a bit because of the city environment....
Awesome? YouTube - Gmod Nuke Test
Which game do you think has the best nukes? I think CoD4s was quite good