Sorry if I missed something, but has a linux server been confirmed ? We're considering a new server for our clan, and we'd really need to know 
Upvote
0
Server 101 questions about servers.
- Thread starter spraduke
- Start date
isn't the ro devs (betatest) server hosted on a linux server over at clanservers.com. As most of their servers are linux.
Upvote
0
just messed about with the source dedicated server on my home pc, It was super simple to set up and install. If RO dedi server had that kind of interface to intialy cfg it and then webadmin to tweak we would all be laughing!
Upvote
0
Will server owners need to contact you to get this download, or will it be public?[RO]Ramm-Jaeger said:
Btw: Linux server would be a big advantage, anyone serious about their gameservers use linux.
Upvote
0
Ghadafi said:
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/security/0,39020375,39245873,00.htm
I don’t know but we are going windows this time for our server. And from my personal experience, we have 7 other game servers running with different hardware configurations, different games etc, but I've found windows to be waaay more stable. Yes, it requires some extra hardware resources, but it is a minor flaw comparing to all those advantages, like remote control is a cake, for me it's important, considering I’m 2000km away from those bloody servers
Upvote
0
Yeah, I hate that about the linux, honestly, there should some way to connect to linux servers from another location, that would be a huge advantage.
Upvote
0
I use Putty and mc (most of the time) while working with linux/unix based systems (so I can do it on the go, while at work or even at the library computer), and even very old unix systems (liked 1999 builds) work fine, but you cant compare a command line with a full remote control management system. At least if you dont consider working with the CL as a sign of 1337esspraduke said:
Upvote
0
vonRas said:I use Putty and mc (most of the time) while working with linux/unix based systems (so I can do it on the go, while at work or even at the library computer), and even very old unix systems (liked 1999 builds) work fine, but you cant compare a command line with a full remote control management system. At least if you dont consider working with the CL as a sign of 1337es
CLI is not 133t, its just faster
Upvote
0
A commandline IS a full remote control management system. What you want is the ability to click on buttons. And when you really get into the down-n-dirty hardcore windows sysadmin duties you fire up a cmd shell. Not because it's 1337, but because it works much better. How many times have users been frustrated because they can't browse for a network share or windows is telling you that you already have a share mounted (but the explorer doesn't show it) and "net use" saves your bacon?vonRas said:I use Putty and mc (most of the time) while working with linux/unix based systems (so I can do it on the go, while at work or even at the library computer), and even very old unix systems (liked 1999 builds) work fine, but you cant compare a command line with a full remote control management system. At least if you dont consider working with the CL as a sign of 1337es
Upvote
0
Ability to click on buttons? why not? Im fine with any type of control management system at hand, but sometimes it's better to have a "user-friendly" (or whatever you call it) interface for some obvious reasons.
well, maybe it's just me...
well, maybe it's just me...
Upvote
0
![[TW]schneidzekk](/data/avatars/s/0/1.jpg?1568638684){kind=avatar}
[RO]schneidzekk said:No.
Right
Well you're either out to mock me, or you (tripwire) don't know yet yourself ...maybe both
I think a lot of people would appreciate an official announcement about servers (platform, spec needed etc) as soon is it's possible.
Spanks.
Upvote
0