[Game] Battlefield: Bad Company

[Colt .45 killer]

mabie just mabie they will make a hardcore mode like cod 4 has, however it would still most likley have conefire,meaning that perfect headshot is a .. *roles a dice* HAHA TOTAL MISS!!!

 

[PsYcH0_Ch!cKeN]

Hmm. At the end of the day, it's still a Battlefield game with its iffy damage model and infantry combat (and worse, it's 100% console), however I'm quite interested and impressed with a lot of the technologies and ideas they're using for this game. Regardless of whether or not I like the game itself, if this becomes popular (as it undoubtedly will) then it should get other developers interested in copying the good features and that'll be something to benefit us all.

So in short, I'm hoping for great success for this title, for the good of all gamers. The day we get a battlefield like that in a tactical shooter will be the day I cry tears of joy.

 

[Colt .45 killer]

perhaps your overstepping yourself, as i believe destructable environments and penetration was first the cry of the realism market. however games like RO came out on engines where that was impossible, RO2 based on the ut3 will have pretty much the whole lot of things they are advertising here.

 

[Xendance]

perhaps your overstepping yourself, as i believe destructable environments and penetration was first the cry of the realism market. however games like RO came out on engines where that was impossible, RO2 based on the ut3 will have pretty much the whole lot of things they are advertising here.

I wouldn't count on it (even if they were making RO 2).

 

[Rak]

Well, that would be disappointing.

 

[PsYcH0_Ch!cKeN]

UE3 won't handle destructible environments any more than UE2.5 did I'm afraid. It's not that sort of engine.

 

[Fedorov]

well, in UT3 you see a lot of pieces falling from the vehicles when they are getting destroyed

 

[KrazyKraut]

Those are not part of the environment, though. And they are only cosmetical iirc. GoW2 will have real-time structural analysis implemented though (-> destructable environments), but I somehow doubt this "UE3.5" is covered by TWI's license.

 

[Fedorov]

they can modify the engine on their own to adapt it to their needs, I'm not saying that they will do it, but I'm sure that they will at least try

 

[Rak]

I wouldn't mind not having destructible environment, but the penetration modelling is important.

 

[[TW]schneidzekk]

Those are not part of the environment, though. And they are only cosmetical iirc. GoW2 will have real-time structural analysis implemented though (-> destructable environments), but I somehow doubt this "UE3.5" is covered by TWI's license.

This "UE3.5" is UE3.

 

[Pharnakes]

So in other words it is covered?

 

[KrazyKraut]

This "UE3.5" is UE3.

But the GoW2 UE3 is definetly a different build than UT3 or R6 Vegas, unless the terrain deforming stuff is simply disabled in those games.

 

[Zips]

But the GoW2 UE3 is definetly a different build than UT3 or R6 Vegas, unless the terrain deforming stuff is simply disabled in those games.

New features are added all the time to engines. Epic must have felt that this update wasn't significant enough to warrant a major step up in their version number.

 

[Reddog]

Playing a battlefield game with a controller just seems like a recipe for pain to me.

 

[BadKarma]

Downloaded the demo yesterday and i just wanted to play a few minutes; started at 19:00 stopped playing at 2:00. Like it, of course it

 

[kapulA]

For one of the consoles I presume?
I really wish they'd make a PC version.

 

[Rak]

*Cough BF3 cough*

 

[DraKon2k]

*Cough BF3 cough*

Yeah if they'd finally ANNOUNCE IT

 

[The Masta]

Playing a battlefield game just seems like a recipe for pain to me.

fixed