Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 4.15
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 4.15
What's your basic political standpoint?
- Thread starter [-project.rattus-]
- Start date
I like how the SS reenactors end up in the top right corner. Big surprise 
There aren't any SS reenactors in this thread AFAIK. If you mean SS realism unit members as well, there aren't any of those in here, I'm afraid.
It's a flawed test that means absolutely nothing. But I am bored.
Economic Left/Right: -1.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.56
Figured I'd turn up more authoritarian because I think the mildest form of punishment for violent criminals should be use as a moving target, but it must have been counterbalanced by the fact I also believe in free love and drugs for everyone.
Economic Left/Right: -1.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.56
Figured I'd turn up more authoritarian because I think the mildest form of punishment for violent criminals should be use as a moving target, but it must have been counterbalanced by the fact I also believe in free love and drugs for everyone.
any americans here ever use this.. http://glassbooth.org/ it's still set on the 2008 election, pretty cool quiz to help match you to a candidate.. worked great for me said i was 97% similar to mike gravel and 96% with ralph nader.. obama and mccain were 56% and 34% respectively..
This is why I'm not having children.. no future generation == no responsibility needed! Woohoo!
I didn't encounter a single question in the survey I can strongly answer with the answers given. Excpet for the last two topics, they are just not relevant but simple.
Just an example: There are no savage and civilised peoples; there are only different cultures.
Well this is just wrongly stated. There are savage and civilized peoples, however this is relative to the culture you yourself are.
It's subjective and with my reasoning I have simultaneously have to agree and disagree...
A lot of the statements are also context dependant: A genuine free market requires restrictions on the ability of predator multinationals to create monopolies.
It doesn't require to be restricted, but when not restricted there is a chance that a monopoly is created, that doesn't mean that without restrictions there will always be monopolies...
And so for every question I had some doubts about what they mean or what are the assumptions... really bad statements tbh.
I was almost exactly in the middle btw.
Just an example: There are no savage and civilised peoples; there are only different cultures.
Well this is just wrongly stated. There are savage and civilized peoples, however this is relative to the culture you yourself are.
It's subjective and with my reasoning I have simultaneously have to agree and disagree...
A lot of the statements are also context dependant: A genuine free market requires restrictions on the ability of predator multinationals to create monopolies.
It doesn't require to be restricted, but when not restricted there is a chance that a monopoly is created, that doesn't mean that without restrictions there will always be monopolies...
And so for every question I had some doubts about what they mean or what are the assumptions... really bad statements tbh.
I was almost exactly in the middle btw.
Why would the far right like the internet? It's all about diversity; different peoples coming together to share in common pursuits and reap the benefits of globalisation.
To an extent, the internet is the culmination of everything the right should loathe.
To an extent, the internet is the culmination of everything the right should loathe.