What exactly do 'we' want

  • Please make sure you are familiar with the forum rules. You can find them here: https://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/index.php?threads/forum-rules.2334636/
aaz777

aaz777

Active member
Jun 30, 2013
1,840
3
38
Russia, Pushkin
ro2player said:
I think the GAME is realist.
And few WEAPONS are unhistoric. (mkb 42 avt 40 pps42 etc)

With a mp 40 with silencer added the game will become more unhistoric...
Click to expand...

I really dont understand the way you think.
Game has MANY unhistorical weapons/upgrades and a lot of weapons have incorrect popularity. Some of unhistorical things were added recently ( PPS42). But it doesnt matter, now the game is historic.
If they add 1 Historicall gun game becomes " semi-historic" ONLY BECAUSE I DONT LIKE IT.
you make my brain explode.
 
ro2player

ro2player

FNG / Fresh Meat
Sep 1, 2011
882
4
0
aaz777 said:
oh, even more funny. So USSR and Germany were making silenced Nagant revolvers, Mosin rifles, Mauser rifles, G43s, STG44s, MP40s and sent exclusively to British commandos. CONGRATULATIONS, YOU BLOWED UP MY BRAIN.
Click to expand...

Regular troop need regular weapons. That's what I say. We don't need commando weapons...
 
Last edited:
ro2player

ro2player

FNG / Fresh Meat
Sep 1, 2011
882
4
0
aaz777 said:
this is just your own opinion that we dont need commandos, dont add it to all players by word " we " and dont mix up it with any historical accuracy.
Click to expand...

So you want to be a commando ??
Please : Don't dream. Be realist.

Asking silencer for mp40 it's make RO 2 a new COD...

Historical accuracy works with regular weapons and regular troops...that's my opinion.
 
JosephBaier

JosephBaier

FNG / Fresh Meat
Mar 3, 2013
1,535
1
0
Neither the weapons nor the gameplay are historically accurate. I don't see why you think so.
 
ro2player

ro2player

FNG / Fresh Meat
Sep 1, 2011
882
4
0
JosephBaier said:
Neither the weapons nor the gameplay are historically accurate. I don't see why you think so.
Click to expand...

A part of weapons and a part of gameplay are historically accurate.
That's why RO 2 is an historic game.

Adding mp40 with silencers will make this game semi historic.
Same for late war period tanks.
 
ro2player

ro2player

FNG / Fresh Meat
Sep 1, 2011
882
4
0
oldsoldier173 said:
A semi historical game where now everyone seems to want weapons and such that were never there, or even existed in that time frame other than prototypes. 'Stalingrad' was an Infantryman's battle in the bombed out urban environment, not really vehicle 'friendly'. Many players have NO real concept of even who had what weapons when. The silenced MP-40 for the Russians post was laughable.
Click to expand...
I am agree with Oldsoldier on this point.

aaz777 said:
Dream? wait, i am doing something for this game unlike you. So in this situation you are dreaming a little bit more than me.
Click to expand...

I mean don't dream of weapons and use of weapons who were not used in Stalingrad...
 
Last edited:
LugNut

LugNut

FNG / Fresh Meat
Feb 12, 2011
2,288
117
0
I think arguing at this point is.. pointless.
Click to expand...

I've learned this long ago, just let him ramble, it's never a discussion, it's always a lecture. If you can step back, it's often bizarre enough to be amusing. ;)
 
aaz777

aaz777

Active member
Jun 30, 2013
1,840
3
38
Russia, Pushkin
ro2player said:
I mean don't dream of weapons and use of weapons who were not used in Stalingrad...
Click to expand...

any reason why i " cant dream ' about these weapons on NOT STALINGRAD maps? you are not my mommy to say what i shouldnt dream. Its very comfortable to shut all mouths on the forum and dictate what you want.
 
ro2player

ro2player

FNG / Fresh Meat
Sep 1, 2011
882
4
0
aaz777 said:
any reason why i " cant dream ' about these weapons on NOT STALINGRAD maps? you are not my mommy to say what i shouldnt dream. Its very comfortable to shut all mouths on the forum and dictate what you want.
Click to expand...

Just saying Oldsoldier is right.

Defending regular troop using regular weapons. That's the base of the game, is not it ??
 
aaz777

aaz777

Active member
Jun 30, 2013
1,840
3
38
Russia, Pushkin
ro2player said:
Just saying Oldsoldier is right.

Defending regular troop using regular weapons. That's the base of the game, is not it ??
Click to expand...

base of the game? hmm

MP40 with double mag, MKB42 ( even with scope ), Mg34 double drum mag, c96 auto, nagant silenced, g41 scoped, SVT 6x scoped.. No, this is exactly not the base of the game.
And please, explain, why do you have right to shut my mouth when i "dream" about adding any special troops in game with special weapons THAT REALLY EXISTED? its the same if i will go and shut mouths of everybody who is " dreaming " about whole war 41-45 game with all battles of all time periods ( kleist ), or i will go and shut IOM devs mouths for creating SS skins, you think its perfectly normal?
 
ro2player

ro2player

FNG / Fresh Meat
Sep 1, 2011
882
4
0
aaz777 said:
base of the game? hmm

MP40 with double mag, MKB42 ( even with scope ), Mg34 double drum mag, c96 auto, nagant silenced, g41 scoped, SVT 6x scoped.. No, this is exactly not the base of the game.
Click to expand...

All we need it's historic and regular weapons.
(historic AND regular : it's my opinion but i shut my mouths...)

aaz777 said:
And please, explain, why do you have right to shut my mouth when i "dream" about adding any special troops in game with special weapons THAT REALLY EXISTED? its the same if i will go and shut mouths of everybody who is " dreaming " about whole war 41-45 game with all battles of all time periods ( kleist ), or i will go and shut IOM devs mouths for creating SS skins, you think its perfectly normal?
Click to expand...

because TOO MUCH GAMES ON LATE WAR PERIOD !!!

NOW WE NEED MIDDLE WAR PERIOD GAMES ! AND EARLY WAR PERIOD GAMES !

Bye
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom