There seems to be a community of people who like to act like..
"If you don't like this game derp derp then you should go play something deerp, and if you think this was supposed to be like RO1 deerp I'm sorry that you don't like Stalingrad for what it is derp derp because you're either a COD fanboy or expected too much deeeerp"
"...but will thier be enough people to fill even 1 64 player server once its all fixed? well between mods and maps probably not."
Don't be such a ****ing ignoramus - we, 'the fanboys', already all agreed that there are bugs. In fact, we started reporting these bugs and mistakes and whatnot straight away.find it funny how the fanboys flocked to this like bees to honey. as OP said anyone with eyes (and atlest a semi good taste in FPS) will tell you there are alot of things wrong with RO2, mostly machanically (bugs and poor optimization) but also gameplay wise (MKBs, unlocks that mess with balance, no drum for PPSH)
can it be worked out? ya probably, but will thier be enough people to fill even 1 64 player server once its all fixed? well between mods and maps probably not.
. You pop your head out and you get popped by a guy 130 meters away on the first try and he was actually sprinting at the time instantly stopped and aimed his weapon to kill you.
Really? This is what an experience is to you? Use some sense man, stop thinking about yourself.
Don't be such a ****ing ignoramus - we, 'the fanboys', already all agreed that there are bugs. In fact, we started reporting these bugs and mistakes and whatnot straight away.
People ought to learn to read before joining this forum; half of it is filled with cretins.
//Edit:
The whole point was that posting 'feedback' that appears to be more of a rant, a nerd rage, or something among those lines is absolutely pointless, especially if you don't even suggest any improvements. Get a clue.
If you've just joined in the last three months and you call yourself a Fanboi, you have a hell of a lot to learn. May I recommend reading the forum posts for the last 2 or three years?
What you are seeing here is the old guard of Fanboi's who were, well blatantly put, backstabbed. We havent received a tactical shooter, while HOS keeps some of the good bits of Ost, it strays from the spirit of Ost or any good tactical shooter in so many ways.
Actually the best thing to do if you want to inform yourself of the situation is to watch the press release videos, and read old posts on the forums, the ones where we were told of a very different game. Please also realize these were not hype based comments, they were factual. For example the difference between "the game will be fun" and "there will be a hero class who will get rare weapons, there will be ONE of these per team". The second is factual, and it is statements like those that we were fed.
The OP has got it nailed right on the head.
@ about half the posts in here, Clean up your act, even if you disagree with someone either dont post, or do so in a respectful manner! If you are un-capable of that then be gone from these forums.
Okay, I'll put it out there: You're a moron. We're not denying anything - we are very well aware that this game has an abundant amount of issues. We, unlike you, provide _proper_ feedback about these issues and have been doing so for a while. Now, _WE_ understand that once an issue has been reported multiple times, reporting it any further no longer stresses it's importance but is just quite literally nagging - it's not going to get the developers to work faster, better, or more efficiently or w/e it is that you're trying to achieve.
'These people', the ones who can change things, are essentially us and not you. You see, no matter how immature it might seem, the developers are more likely to listen to people who post constructive feedback with actual suggestions, rather than just complaints (for example). You might as well have posted bullet-points with "This is ****" and "That is ****" and "This is also ****" and so forth, because you're doing nothing other than repeating what others have said and providing nothing of any real value to anyone who might be interested in reading your wall of text in order to improve this game.
I am very well aware of this not-so-peachy situation of this game - I play it competitively, at least to the current extent to which the game allows one to do so.. I post my experiences as well, and I post feedback, and I contact the developers should I find it necessary to let them know something, instead of seemingly contacting the community and sort of setting up a 'lets-bash-the-devs' type of flashmob, which inevitably sets up a counter-bash flashmob and so we really get nowhere. Stop holding us back.
OP argument... 'my opinion is in fact not an opinion but the actually solid facts and anyone not agreeing with me is a douch fanboy mindlessly defending a fundamentally flawed game'.
Bravo. Glad you set us all straight.
A Special Olympics participant could write a better argument than you just did; that's something to think about.ooo what an angry sounding post, did i hit a nerve? ofcourse theres bugs anyone with any gaming experince knows that ALL games have **** ton of bugs at the begining. thing is with RO2 half theses bugs make the game practically unplayable, between the poor netcode (all servers with 150+ ping) and sound bugs and lag spikes i can barely manage to play for more then 30mins without pounding my head into the wall. even the beta ran about 50% smoother and less glichy then the retail version, what game actually gets worse later on??
yes sure theres alot of pointless threads about nerd raging over really silly things, but theres alot more "fanboys" just trash talking anyone who even dares to think that RO2 should be better than this.
a one legged diabetic with a bad hip could run better then this game.