I'm using the language of the era. Political correctness has no place here.
Last edited by a moderator:
The battle you would most like to see represented in RS
- Thread starter Nimsky
- Start date
I'm using the language of the era. Political correctness has no place here.
Not only 'nah' but NFW - why would we get together a crew of really talented devs (and Razorneck
) to remake someone else's map?Fuggedaboudit.
RS-Danzig is going to blow your minds.
ANZAC troops you mean?
PsychoChicken, thanks. maybe one day (not too far away)
GbtS, That goes without saying...of course the East Islands are included
I would like these maps:
Wake Island
Philippines
Guadalcanal
Iwo Jima
Okinawa
I have big hopes for this
Wake Island
Philippines
Guadalcanal
Iwo Jima
Okinawa
I have big hopes for this
I'm going to upset Nestor in a big way by saying that you will see some of those locales in RS.
I'm not however, going to tell you which ones...
I would love to see the Battle for Manila. A battle completely different from the rest of the Pacific campaign with a lot of urban combat.
Japanese Naval Bombardment on Guadalcanal would add that extra touch of realism, if you guys are even considering off map arty, or Guadalcanal (YOU BETTER BE! )
As far as battles that should be included, there appear to be two paths going on in this thread. Those that want single, iconic battles, and those that want larger campaign type action. Now if the devs make this thing like HOS, they would have a series of maps in the campaign that would be strung together and those same maps would be in multiplayer.
Where I stand: I think that the multiplayer and single player missions should be the same (FOR RELEASE). After realease, multiplayer maps could be expanded, while the single player campaign stays the same. Mapping takes a while (I do a little for mod) and with heavy foliage that time gets multiplied. I will understand if the Devs can ONLY ship with say...... 7 maps, so I want them to make the most well known ones first, and do them well.
) As far as battles that should be included, there appear to be two paths going on in this thread. Those that want single, iconic battles, and those that want larger campaign type action. Now if the devs make this thing like HOS, they would have a series of maps in the campaign that would be strung together and those same maps would be in multiplayer.
Where I stand: I think that the multiplayer and single player missions should be the same (FOR RELEASE). After realease, multiplayer maps could be expanded, while the single player campaign stays the same. Mapping takes a while (I do a little for mod) and with heavy foliage that time gets multiplied. I will understand if the Devs can ONLY ship with say...... 7 maps, so I want them to make the most well known ones first, and do them well.