Even if ArmA 2 is buggy (still haven't got the game yet) and what not the Game Star wrote a lot of dip****.
They wrote that the game is too complex and that the manual and the ingame tutorials don't give enough information on how things work. Well it is still a simulation and you have to spent a bit of time with it ...
They moan about how the graphics are too detailed and you can't see enemies, obviously they hate the game for what it is
Then they say you can't play the game on small monitors (not for the first time) because of the high amount of detail, this is one pointless statment because they don't say what "small" means for them and if you ask me if I have a bigger monitor and a bigger FOV it can make things harder too.
Ok the AI seems not to work or only sometimes that sucks but it doesn't make the game unplayable and they didn't report any crashes or technical problems either.
Also the Game Star invented the inofficial beta patch, what is that? Afaik the patch is from Bohemia Interactive (aka "official")
So what I heard so far sounds like ArmA 2 has still problems (but definatley a lot less then Dragon Rising
) but what did you expect with a complex game like that? Still nothing game breaking, I will have fun with it later
It can't be worse than Empire or GTA IV
The Game Star wrote so much shi1t about other games too, the reason they didn't liked Kiling Floor was basically that it wasn't Left 4 Dead.
The user rating is now at 73%
