More honest than implementing a token, very well publicized sex scene to lure in the twelve year-olds!
You know it's a blunt marketing ploy when they take out the gay option but leave the lesbian option in there. Because everyone knows lesbians making out are hot but gay dudes playing with chest-hair is gross...
The whole sex scene issue in Mass Effect 1 and 2 just disgusted me.
Now, the sex scene(s?) in Red Dead Redemption where fantastic, because they had a point. And a hilarious one at that! (that both sides of the revolution where only out to literally **** the people they pretended to care about in their empty rhetoric). I only point this out so no one sticks me in the prude soccer-mom camp. I can appreciate the value of a sex scene, IF it has value.
At the very least, that's the biggest plus of a straight-up "boobs, lol" stunt like that, fans can't defend this as important to the plot, which the sex scenes in ME1/2 clearly aren't. Because they're optional, for one thing.
At least that stunt can be discussed for what it is. Using sex to move product.
And in so doing I only have to say: Tasteless but nothing new. Don't care.
They don't look medieval
at all though. Even bad period pieces, as much they usually mix-and-match periods and regions to create a look that looks good to modern audiences, at least attempt to give off a vague "ye oldern thymes" vibe. I don't even see a minimum of effort there.