• Please make sure you are familiar with the forum rules. You can find them here: https://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/index.php?threads/forum-rules.2334636/

So I heard this was coming - not

Lol fear this on the battlefield XD :IS2:
2vuk9kw.jpg


:eek:



Please realize this is a joke :IS2:
 
LOL seriously, you would think after the first and second failures they would start to get the picture ...

And I really would like to know how those little AA turrets were supposed to be effective, especially since the second one is BETWEEN two bigass turrets.

The nature of the failures is the best thing about this story though:

Failure #1: One turret shoots central turret accidently, blowing up the tank

Failure #2: The tank ****ING CRACKS IN HALF from its own weight

Failure #3: The tank BLOWS ITSELF OVER from too many guns its narrow width.

This is like Three-Stooges-Go-To-War or something -- proof that war can be funny if you look at it in certain ways.
 
Upvote 0
I think the guy who drew this never realised that the 152mm gun had two part ammo, with projectile and propellant bags.

except it was allegedly a 156mm Naval gun, not the 152mm we may be more familiar with. I don't know if the 156 was also a two parter.

BTW, this tank never really existed. It's likely a modern hoax, as there isn't any evidence of it's existence, besides a badly Photoshopped image.
 
Upvote 0