Question about sights in the game
- Thread starter Qweets
- Start date
[url]http://www.gametrailers.com/video/exclusive-gameplay-red-orchestra/719541[/URL]
Sure! It's around 1:56 when the video is switching between the tense moments.
Those scopes look way too thick compared to the screenshot I linked, in the screen it has a small opening where you look into it and a wide exit but a thin tiny tubelike mid-section.. Those are all pretty much thick from front to back.. You sure its a zf4?
The scope in video at 1:56?
Red Orchestra 2 - Heroes of Stalingrad - Multiplayer Gameplay Trailer - YouTube
Red Orchestra 2 - Heroes of Stalingrad - Multiplayer Gameplay Trailer - YouTube
I am no expert, but it looks way more like a ZF41 when compared to googled up images. The ZF41 also has a rather large diameter in front and gets significantly thinner in the back.
What one may assume that is in the game are ZF41 for MKB42 and G41. The sniper version of the k-98 may have different scopes too, but I would not know which.
In the end, the problem is not the availability of sights, but whether they could be mounted. MP40 and PPsh do not seem to have any way of mounting any different sight than they have as a standard. There simply was no picatinny rail system back then like it is the craze now. And consider: With the MP40 and PPsh you would not shoot precisely at longer ranges than 50-100 meters max. The standard iron-sights would be completely satisfactory for this cheaply and mass produced weapons.
As said, there is line of individual upgrades for every weapon, but no true customization as in other games.
whoa weird, it looks like they were looking their their ironsights and not the scope during that couple frames you can see it though.. Looks like it'll be similar to maybe having an acog scope.. Looked as if it was attached to one of the semi auto rifles. "EXCITED!" Can't wait to get something like that.
No.
Aiming using aperture sight in WaW:
Real M1 Garand sight:
http://www.cheesepatrol.com/images/garand/garand3.jpg
The release just got ten times scarier.
Holy mackarel, what did you people do to my RO game?
Just about the whole historically accurate stuff.
WWII in particular saw Many developments and "beta" testing of lot's of equipment.
Here are two of the best cases:
and
the second if you haven't guessed it yet is a night vision scope.
But I agree, red dot's sight has no place in this game
WWII in particular saw Many developments and "beta" testing of lot's of equipment.
Here are two of the best cases:
and
the second if you haven't guessed it yet is a night vision scope.
But I agree, red dot's sight has no place in this game
Yeah I agree about the red dots not being in this game.. I was just mostly curious aboutt he aperture and if it was actually real, glad to know it isn't. I don't see why they would make a WW2 game and make up fake attachments.. That just seems incredibly stupid. But whatever it's call of duty anyway that game is full of stupid as it is.
IMHO, once you've played RO2 for awhile, you'll see those "customisation" things as the cheap marketing trick they really are. Even in those games they rarely make the game better, if not actually making it worse.
They are gimmicks meant to distract you from the otherwise crappy nature of those half-assed FPS'. In a game like RO2, you will be too busy just trying to stay alive and get a kill or two, to notice that you don't have a red dot sight or a "cool" cammo scheme on your weapon.
In CoD-like games, they have to give you loads of unlocks etc, otherwise you'd get bored of the game within a week or two.