Whenever the debate about the cracter from The Ball comes up, I can always rely on Nutterbutter to say something.
the same thing happens when someone criticizes TW regarding paid DLC
Whenever the debate about the cracter from The Ball comes up, I can always rely on Nutterbutter to say something.
It's a terrible thing for players with OCD, though.
Seeing a list of unlocked characters all neatly lined up, just to be ruined by that damn Harchier Spebbington.
The reason is the promise this char to stay as pre-order bonus.Meh, why not? No real reason to keep him exclusive anymore.
The reason is the promise this char to stay as pre-order bonus.
EDIT: The char itself is very ugly though. I have it but I maybe used it just 3 or 4 times at all.
Just like the promise not to release game changing DLC that would divide the community into those who have the DLC, and those that don't?
Just like the promise not to release game changing DLC that would divide the community into those who have the DLC, and those that don't? I personally don't give a crap about the new weapons mysel, but my point is, even though I have the character, I don't see a reason to add community dividing DLC while still keeping the Ball character exclusive. In for a penny, in for a pound.
Sorry, when you said "dividing the community" my mind jumped to Call of Duty. I suppose that's an extreme example though, because you get kicked from the server/ lobby if it switches to a map they have but you don't. Then again, CoD is probably one of the reason people seem to hate paid DLC so much. At least we get maps for free.
At least with KF you can play in the same server as people that have the weapon pack and they can even give you the weapon for you to use. Granted, if play X is in a game with a bunch of dbags or doesn't play with people on their friends list, yes that would really suck. :\
It always been like thatMaps are paid DLC in COD? Wow, I knew the franchise had turned bad, but I never imagined how bad.