Performance Benchmark Thread

[tamasnemeti]

AMD Phenom II 955 BE@3.4GHz (4 cores)
GAINWARD GTX650Ti Boost 1GB
8GB RAM
Resolution is 1920x1080

On Ultra, it runs with around 30FPS stable, it stutters and drops because I am running out of VRAM here...
On High it keeps around 50.
On Medium it locks to 62, but I get drops occasionally, seemingly for no reason. When there is much carnage and zeds it can drop to 40.
On Low settings, with High textures and FXAA I have not noticed any drop so far, and the game still looks pretty damn good to me.

I guess I'll tweak the settings a bit, I am aiming for 60FPS.
Hopefully further optimizations will also happen during EA, so I am quite happy with this atm.

I will give it a go on my notebook as well on the weekend, with the following hardware:

i3 4030U@1.9GHZ (2 cores, with hyper-treading)
NVIDIA GeForce 840M
4GB

It also has a fullhd screen, but I don't think it can handle on that resolution. We'll see.
Will update the post with the results on Saturday.

 

[Lalee88]

Sapphire HD5850 Xtreme 1GB GDDR5
Intel i5-2400 Quad-Core 3.1 GHz
2x4GB DDR3 1333MHz
1TB 7200rpm SATA2 HDD
1920x1080
Win7 - 64 bit

With everything on ULTRA (v-ysync off) FPS is around 30.
On HIGH with RealtimeReflections, and 16x filtering I got around 40 FPS. With RR off its 45-55, even if I turn up some of the stuff to ULTRA.
Sooo... RR is demanding.

 

[C0H33D]

ASUS STRIX GTX 970 3.5 gb vram
i7 4790k
8gb ram
1080p
Win7 - 64 bit

I'm able to run the game max settings and get solid 62 fps with vsync on. There is some hiccups but that mostly happens when opening and closing the trader.

 

[Lalee88]

There is some hiccups but that mostly happens when opening and closing the trader.

Yeah, the trader is damn laggy...

 

[NonCom]

We shouldn't get too predictive until the actual spec is announced. It will come out soon.

Of course, we are still optimizing so we'll push the min spec lower over time.

In the meantime, we can generalize and say, for early access, cores are good, hyper threading, GPU's by either of the 2 dominant makers, of somewhat recent vintage, are good. Recent operating systems. All the things you would expect.

Also recall that NVIDIA's numbering system is centered with the N50 card being middle of the pack for that series. That often means that a lower series card ending with 60 or 70+ is better than a higher series card ending in 30 or 40. So, a GeForce GTX 280, 540M and 735M have almost the same 3D performance.

 

[Hugobertington]

Haven't got a beta key yet, will defo get i on the 21st though, but here's my specs on this Laptop

GPU: AMD Radeon HD 8800M card
CPU: Intel i7 4700 HQ
RAM: 16GB installed

Previous experience was an unplayable framerate and texture pop-in with Wolfenstein TNO but a surprisingly smooth playthrough of Metro Last Light on low settings. So no clue what all that is.

As for UE3 experience, XCOM EU and all expansions, ran smoothly on medium settings

So I have no idea what to expect, simply because it's hard to gauge what level of performance there is to a graphics card from name alone.

 

[Kyoku]

On High I have a stable 60 fps. Didn't test ultra yet. GPU is 270

 

[Crispian11]

We shouldn't get too predictive until the actual spec is announced. It will come out soon.

Of course, we are still optimizing so we'll push the min spec lower over time.

In the meantime, we can generalize and say, for early access, cores are good, hyper threading, GPU's by either of the 2 dominant makers, of somewhat recent vintage, are good. Recent operating systems. All the things you would expect.

Also recall that NVIDIA's numbering system is centered with the N50 card being middle of the pack for that series. That often means that a lower series card ending with 60 or 70+ is better than a higher series card ending in 30 or 40. So, a GeForce GTX 280, 540M and 735M have almost the same 3D performance.

Will you be supporting SLI at the release of Early Access?

 

[mmnicolas]

So far the game runs better than KF1

Intel Q8300, Nvidia GTX 960, 8gb of ram, cheap hp system with upgraded gpu :IS2:

 

[ashxu]

How's the performance on KF2? To those who have it, is it similar as Red Orchestra 2?

Looking at buying a new PC with a standard GTX 960 2GB but judging from the thread that won't be enough to run the game at high/60fps.

 

[silverlighted]

I guess I'll tweak the settings a bit, I am aiming for 60FPS.
Hopefully further optimizations will also happen during EA, so I am quite happy with this atm.

I will give it a go on my notebook as well on the weekend, with the following hardware:



It also has a fullhd screen, but I don't think it can handle on that resolution. We'll see.
Will update the post with the results on Saturday.

Sweet, finally something that is similar to my setup I think. Looks promising ^_^

 

[Redthirst]

It would be nice if they would open the stress test for a day or two to everyone who owns KF1, so we can check our perfomance firsthand.

 

[WalterS]

I`ll post my rig, in-game settings and results if I`ll get the key from that PCGamer giveaway thingy

 

[numberfortyseven]

AMD FX-8120 @ 4.1GHz, 8GB RAM, Radeon R9 280x (runing latest Catalyst 15.3 beta).

These are my settings:
http://i.imgur.com/Ti8Kbr3.jpg

Mainly 70-90 fps. Get some weird drop into 50s, caused by medic grenades?

 

[Tumbs!]

Does anyone imagines how my laptop is going to handle this game?

Specs:
Intel i5 3337U @ 1,8 GHz
8 GB RAM
GPU: Nvidia Geforce GT 630M 1GB

I'm scared...

 

[Radingod]

You may have heating issues (like most laptops) and if you push it you will likely run out of V-ram on the card causing drops. You should however see no issues on lowest and go about 30 FPS. I recommend a laptop fan since your card probably throttles around 80c and you will easily hit that and lose frames.

 

[Arblarg]

Does anyone imagines how my laptop is going to handle this game?

Specs:
Intel i5 3337U @ 1,8 GHz
8 GB RAM
GPU: Nvidia Geforce GT 630M 1GB

I'm scared...

720p on low should be more than playable. You might be able to turn on AA without too much of a performance hit.

 

[drfeelgoodmd]

My specs: MSI GS60 Ghost-470 Gaming Laptop
CPU: Intel Core i7-4710HQ 2.5 GHz
GPU: NVIDIA Geforce GTX 860M
RAM: 12Gb plus 2GB or 4GB of video memory (not sure because this was actually built faster and stronger than it was listed as. i'm guessing they ran out of parts)
OS: Windows 8.1 / 64Bit
HDD: 1 TB 7200 RPM + 128 GB M.2 SATA SSD

On the default High settings I felt the game was incredibly laggy. On Medium its better but still not great. There is no reason why my gaming laptop shouldn't handle this game. It handles any other game I play just fine. I dunno if I'm tweaking the wrong settings or if there is an issue with the game itself.

Edit:
I restarted my PC which seamed to fix the lag issue... I notice the mouse responsiveness is still off though.

 

[Nenjin]

i7 4790k
GTX 970
16 gigs of ram

Game runs really smooth on ultra, 1920x1080. But I wonder if there's a memory leak, because after a few matches I start getting hitches, usually when there's a siren involved but pretty persistently none the less.

 

[XxY2TxX]

MSI GTX 760 Twin Frozr 2GB Vram
Intel i5-4670 4 Core@3,54 Ghz (OC)
8 GB RAM
Windows 8.1 64 Bit

FullHD + Ultra (without V-Sync) 55-65 FPS (custom FPS lock)
FullHD + High (without V-Sync) 62-65 FPS (custom FPS lock)