People Who Brag to Have Skills Because They Have 100% Achievements is Ridiculous
- Thread starter Kanivakil
- Start date
- Status
But it also implies that he doesn't have all achievements and since the majority of Killing Floor achievements are easy, the statement doesn't carry that much weight since it is unknown which achievements were earned.
Last edited:
If anyone was interested in the actual quote and not a spliced, manipulative version...
gg no re pls
Me and my friend Ben here were having a nice little chat, there's no need for a social commentary on it.
Last edited:
This is not a manipulative quotation. Here he is saying that we have differences in what we enjoy but never have I stated anything about enjoying anything in any one of my responses to anyone for him to make that comparison.
I was commenting on your comment in a topic that is public. You can send him a private message if other people's comment bothers you.
Last edited:
Nien nien. Not just here. I mean.
You just seem like you're angry all the time.
That can't be good for you.
I'm not going to go on a big quote hunt
But I mean just look at that.
"How do I sound angry?"
"Really? I'm not angry. You must have interpreted wrong."
Or the very thing you said here. You could've said something like
"What did I say that sounded angry?"
Here you are almost like
commanding me or something.
You also say OMFG alot and use alot of that "No **** Sherlock" brand of sarcasm.
And it's not a matter of "I don't like your tone mister >:I"
Cuz it don't offend me.
It's just like
Chillll.
Chill makes a better experience for all involved :0
But I mean just look at that.
You sound tense. If you were chill it'd be something like
"How do I sound angry?"
"Really? I'm not angry. You must have interpreted wrong."
Or the very thing you said here. You could've said something like
"What did I say that sounded angry?"
Here you are almost like
commanding me or something.
You also say OMFG alot and use alot of that "No **** Sherlock" brand of sarcasm.
And it's not a matter of "I don't like your tone mister >:I"
Cuz it don't offend me.
It's just like
Chillll.
Chill makes a better experience for all involved :0
Of course I'm going to [purposely] express irritation if I had to repeat myself over three times. To be exact, OMFG was used exactly twice in a topic that has nearly 70 responses. "A lot" is surely a subjective word isn't it?
Of course, there are no facts to go on but your subjective interpretations.
The word you've used "sound" is correct. It is your interpretation and is not a fact.
No one has accused anyone of being angry accept for you. If so, quote me.
"Chill?" You still haven't proven that I'm angry. So how is your accusation justified?
What do you expect when you make an accusation without providing the evidence to support it? Do you think accusations are taken lightly?
Last edited:
But just look at everything you've just said.
I mean. Why are you so defensive?
You said I was "accusing" you :0
If you weren't angry you could just say you're not angry. But you're telling me to provide evidence and all this stuff.
I mean dude, instead of doing a quote hunt I just looked at the thing that says "view all posts by___"
When I say alot I mean alot just recently. It's not normal for people to get irritated that much. It may not technically be a big number, but once per conversation, for example, is alot; just as getting shot twice (while 2 isn't a very big number) is kind of a big deal.
But yeah dude, there's all kinds of stuff you say. I'm not doing a quote hunt because I find the quote system for this forum exhausting.
And I mean, you wouldn't necessarily realize it if you were angry. But calm people just say "Nah I'm not angry" instead of doin all this stuff with quotes and evidence. I mean, this is a place of discussion, not a police report.
It's all just a bit much.
Oh also the bits that I put in quotes were examples; I wasn;t really quoting someone silly
I mean. Why are you so defensive?
You said I was "accusing" you :0
If you weren't angry you could just say you're not angry. But you're telling me to provide evidence and all this stuff.
I mean dude, instead of doing a quote hunt I just looked at the thing that says "view all posts by___"
When I say alot I mean alot just recently. It's not normal for people to get irritated that much. It may not technically be a big number, but once per conversation, for example, is alot; just as getting shot twice (while 2 isn't a very big number) is kind of a big deal.
But yeah dude, there's all kinds of stuff you say. I'm not doing a quote hunt because I find the quote system for this forum exhausting.
And I mean, you wouldn't necessarily realize it if you were angry. But calm people just say "Nah I'm not angry" instead of doin all this stuff with quotes and evidence. I mean, this is a place of discussion, not a police report.
It's all just a bit much.
Oh also the bits that I put in quotes were examples; I wasn;t really quoting someone silly
Last edited:
Do you think calling someone angry is a friendly gesture?
If your line of reasoning can not apparently be supported, you will be questioned.
Again this is your opinion. In my view it is justified to express irritation when someone has to repeat themselves over and over again or when someone acts like complete idiot. You think this is uncommon?
You have nothing to go on but your subjective opinions, just like the many different interpretations of a novel.
People have many different types of personalities. Some may just brush you off but with some others when you say someone is angry without supporting it, they will expect you to support your views to ensure it is a FACT and not your own personal perspectives.
Last edited:
Hi I'm 12 and what is this?
Surprised this thread hasn't been locked. Your repeating of 'quote me' is starting to remind me of 'come at me'. Not sure what you're expecting us to achieve by quoting your posts. Certainly don't want to subject forumgoers to reading your nonsense all over again haha.
Okay that was mean, but seriously, achievements are fun to obtain, they can show that the holder has a at-least a moderate level of skill or game understanding.
Telling people to earn some achievements in order to get practice with the game is not the worst suggestion I've heard...
Surprised this thread hasn't been locked. Your repeating of 'quote me' is starting to remind me of 'come at me'. Not sure what you're expecting us to achieve by quoting your posts. Certainly don't want to subject forumgoers to reading your nonsense all over again haha.
Okay that was mean, but seriously, achievements are fun to obtain, they can show that the holder has a at-least a moderate level of skill or game understanding.
Telling people to earn some achievements in order to get practice with the game is not the worst suggestion I've heard...
Yeah I don't know if this thread ever wasn't derailed :I
Imma go before the admins come in here and break out the peppuh spray >:0
I am gonna get outta here but I just gotta say this dude.
Saying that someone is angry is NOT an offensive gesture.
What you are doing right now is what I'm talking about.
But seriously, we are wasting soooo much space on this page and we aren't accomplishing anything.
Go easy bros :0
*flies away
Imma go before the admins come in here and break out the peppuh spray >:0
I am gonna get outta here but I just gotta say this dude.
Saying that someone is angry is NOT an offensive gesture.
What you are doing right now is what I'm talking about.
But seriously, we are wasting soooo much space on this page and we aren't accomplishing anything.
Go easy bros :0
*flies away
Last edited:
Of course, I shun falsehood. Better not throw out words carelessly in the wind and make assumptions without supporting them because they will wish they can eat their words.
Of course you derailed the topic when you pointed a finger at someone and said they're angry without evidence. But I suspect that since English is your second language, with your overly sensitive interpretations of the responses, I will overlook that.
Regardless, even if that was the case for whatever country or culture that you live in, to make an assumption without supporting it has no value and no one will take it seriously.
Last edited:
Wow that was quick.
look at this
I mean, as far as second languages go, that thought had occured to me but I figured you wouldn've said if English weren't your first.
But look at this mess. You've gotten offended because I said something about you being angry or something, that's not normal.
And no it's not normal to get angry because someone accuses you of being angry without factual evidence, anyone else would just say no and move on.
Gawwwwsh
*flies away for real this time.
look at this
This is what I'm talking about. It's not standard procedure to start going "quote me. Give me evidence. quote me."
I mean, as far as second languages go, that thought had occured to me but I figured you wouldn've said if English weren't your first.
But look at this mess. You've gotten offended because I said something about you being angry or something, that's not normal.
And no it's not normal to get angry because someone accuses you of being angry without factual evidence, anyone else would just say no and move on.
Gawwwwsh
*flies away for real this time.
I was never offended. I'm searching for your line of reasoning behind your thinking. Prove to me what you are saying is a fact.
Still, you haven't proven that I am angry.
mrsirr;1286733; said:
Are you bringing a new element to the table called contradictions on top of your unsupported views?
Last edited:
I think this reply gives us a good insight into why he has created this rather pointless thread. I don't think he really cared what the topic was. He craves an audience, as he refers to us responding, as if he's up on some stage as we all pay close attention to his words. But don't worry we are each getting a "fair share" of his almighty attention. His need for an audience, and ultimately to feel important may explain some of his other recent threads also. Classic Narcissistic Personality Disorder
Of course, I was aware of that possibility for someone to interpret what you've quoted me is possible. But it is only the uneducated person who would do so because all writers after all are writers who are writing to an audience (humans), not a pair a rocks.
When someone is writing, he is writing to his audience to read. Do you expect the stones outside your yard to be doing the reading? Stones aren't quite human are they?
As opposed to what? The rocks somehow have acquired the ability to read text and give responses?
Pointless thread? As I can recall, you've peeped your head in here more than one occasion, but yet you call it pointless. Self-contradiction I presume?
Last edited:
And you're strange for keep coming back when you said you would, "fly away," but yet still keep coming back. Are you Frisbee?
Last edited:
When I said "fly away" I didn't mean I was leaving forever or something (although I am still suprised this thread is still going.)
That's just how I talk
People constantly accuse me of being high :0
That's just how I talk
People constantly accuse me of being high :0
- Status