Pavlov

[Kleist]

I don

 

[Thaelyn]

I do get a slight performance hit on that map, but nothing as extreme as what you're saying here. I do believe that the devs said at one point that Pavlov's was one of the more demanding maps in terms or resources. I may be misremembering, though.

 

[Sufyan]

Since the last patch the map has become nearly unplayable for me. Whenever I respawn or enter a new area, the game freezes as if caching new content. The screen freezes for several seconds, and when the freeze comes loose again I may find myself having walked a long distance unknowingly. This is the only map where my game acts this way.

 

[Vorkoz]

I get weird gfx bugs on pavlov's. So far haven't seen it on other maps.

 

[SheepDip]

Since the last patch one of my friends cannot play Pavlovs house as it crashes RO. All other maps are fine.

 

[Apparo89]

i also don't have good and stable framerate in this map. In others map i get 70-100 fps, in pavlov i get 40 fps mimum 60-70 max

 

[GRIZZLY]

I hope this doesn't mean the game won't be able to handle big ro1 sized maps made in sdk

 

[BigG]

I get strange stuttering on that map...

 

[Thaelyn]

I hope this doesn't mean the game won't be able to handle big ro1 sized maps made in sdk

I don't think it's a matter of map size alone so much as the level of detail in the maps.

 

[Demogorgon]

after a while on this map, my pc starts stuttering too..

 

[Krobar]

i also don't have good and stable framerate in this map. In others map i get 70-100 fps, in pavlov i get 40 fps mimum 60-70 max

Umm are you on meth? Because you'd have to be to see the difference between any of those FPS rates. You only have the right to complain about FPS if it actually enters the "Red" in the stat display. Reason? I average 35 FPS... I don't complain.

 

[Kleist]

All higher than 35fps are good fps

 

[Dan.]

Umm are you on meth? Because you'd have to be to see the difference between any of those FPS rates. You only have the right to complain about FPS if it actually enters the "Red" in the stat display. Reason? I average 35 FPS... I don't complain.

Sorry but if you're used to 60fps like I am, I notice a drop straight away if it goes below 60, 50 Fps I notice, 40 Fps is bad to me.

 

[Mungo]

Must be the bricks.

 

[Kukki]

They removed them couple of patches ago, and now they're back. Performance was the same.

 

[Alperce]

I have minor stuttering in Pavlov's aswell, and most people seem to have an either minor or major fps decrease while playing.

In my case, the game loses about 10 fps when outdoors on pavlovs when compares to other maps, in which I have ~45 fps outdoors, which is quite a bit when compared to the ~35 in Pavlov's.

 

[Mike 78]

I don't think it's a matter of map size alone so much as the level of detail in the maps.

If it can't handle Pavlov's house then there's no way it can handle maps like Berenzina. Larger maps is further viewing distances which requires more of the engine and your system. I'm worried by the bad performance issues for many people and the implication that has on the limitations of the new engine.

 

[Baine]

If it can't handle Pavlov's house then there's no way it can handle maps like Berenzina. Larger maps is further viewing distances which requires more of the engine and your system. I'm worried by the bad performance issues for many people and the implication that has on the limitations of the new engine.

Mh i don't think so. The devil is in the detail. I can play Spartanovka at good fps (30-40) but Pavlovs is a problem.

 

[Kleist]

Maybe barracks is a problem map, too?

 

[6S.Maraz]

Pavlov and Barracks are big problems. They were not during beta. I frankly hope that TWI stops "optimizing" and "improving perfoemances" of the game, because the game runs slower for me at eatch patch.

Intel E8500 3.16Ghz 6M cache
3GB RAM
Nvidia GT240 1GB
Win XP

(I always play with low or medium video settings, but Pavlov and Barracks are a continuous stutter).

Maraz