So today my Retail box arrived. I installed both OstFront and Heroes of Stalingrad. HOS is fun game. OF is good game too. I only played it like for 30 minutes. And HOS for a hour.
After playing them both I understood the difference between the two.
OF: more content, bigger maps, slower paced, harder, dated game (but for its time it should have been really good).
HOS: faster paced, a bit smaller maps, a few new features, easier, less content.
Although I am new to these series, I believe that developers released RO2 too soon. They could have fixed everything, added more vehicles, maps, polished everything, left all old stuff, perhaps improved graphics for 2012 release.
Now the game is fun, it's engine is better, mechanics are better but it has less to it. People keep saying that in time RO2 will grow up and become better, but it could have took shorter.
Also why people call this WWII simulator? Its just tactical FPS, but not a combat sim.
After playing them both I understood the difference between the two.
OF: more content, bigger maps, slower paced, harder, dated game (but for its time it should have been really good).
HOS: faster paced, a bit smaller maps, a few new features, easier, less content.
Although I am new to these series, I believe that developers released RO2 too soon. They could have fixed everything, added more vehicles, maps, polished everything, left all old stuff, perhaps improved graphics for 2012 release.
Now the game is fun, it's engine is better, mechanics are better but it has less to it. People keep saying that in time RO2 will grow up and become better, but it could have took shorter.
Also why people call this WWII simulator? Its just tactical FPS, but not a combat sim.
Last edited:
