For me, the inclusion of camouflaged uniforms etc. is a must! It's just too...boring seeing everyone in almost identical uniforms.
My rant on RO2, a game which I still love an play regularly
- Thread starter Ragnarök
- Start date
I think is important to put a few things in perspective. First, the inclusion of these items would be desirable, but at this point in time, it's going to have to be up to the efforts of modders, just as it was in RO1. If people expect tripwire to do this, it is almost going to have to be for sale downloadable content. And I know how some folks feel about that. But if you want it free, you had better start praying to the modder god.
Looks promising, but in the Stalingrad setting, the only Waffen-SS unit, which was temporarily subordinated to the 6th army, was the 5th Panzer Division Wiking. But it never fought in Stalingrad directly.
Seconded. Especially since camouflage uniform items weren't that rare as many photos of the Battle of Stalingrad illustrate.
I think is important to put a few things in perspective. First, the inclusion of these items would be desirable, but at this point in time, it's going to have to be up to the efforts of modders, just as it was in RO1. If people expect tripwire to do this, it is almost going to have to be for sale downloadable content. And I know how some folks feel about that. But if you want it free, you had better start praying to the modder god.
Well, personally I don't have a problem with dlc as long those things are going to be implemented into RO2 some day.
Last edited:
Hence I said for custom maps. We already have some that aren't set in Stalingrad.
I know, but I
Modders are currently doing the MG-42. No need to discuss it.
And I would love to see camo, mostly the Zeltbahn poncho and camo nets for Helmets.
And I would love to see camo, mostly the Zeltbahn poncho and camo nets for Helmets.
Last edited:
Three Soviet weapons/equipment I would like to see:
-Molotovs
-Flamethrowers (Flamer ROKS(2/3), 2 would be more common)
-White-snow camouflage
-Molotovs
-Flamethrowers (Flamer ROKS(2/3), 2 would be more common)
-White-snow camouflage
Just because there is already a weapon that (my opinion) should not be in the game, it doesnt mean we should add another one. I would actually like to see a mg42 in the future, for maps that are outside of the stalingrad scenario (russian counter offensive as a example) however the mg42 does not belong in the current scenario, both realism and also gameplay wise.
But will it be implemented into HoS and will Tripwire support it?
Nice, but see above.
You can either go historically- or gameplay-wise. It was decided - through experience - that players taking squad leaders are taking this class for the weapon, neglecting the importance of the role as forward scout providing artillery coordinates for commander (and it's very important to have good artillery mark).
Try again after learning some physics.
Muzzle energy for 7.92x57 is 3500 J, 7.92x33 -- 1900 J, 9x19 -- 500-600 J. All three weapons are similar in weight (3.7, 4.0, 4.6 kilos). You can't expect a 7.92 Kurz weapon to have less recoil than a 9x19 SMG.
Mkb might be more precise in sigle shots than MP40 because it is more convenient to aim with, but it can't be anywhere near to being as stable or more stable than MP40.
Hopefully a lot of this things will be changed soon.
RO2 have to much potential, but it
RO2 have to much potential, but it
Last edited:
