For the love of god, Please go die somewhere. Like in a ditch. There isnt a single person in all of the forums that cares what you have to say.
Ban this kid already.
Last edited:
MP-41, Luger, G43 and MG42
- Thread starter Raymond Saint
- Start date
For the love of god, Please go die somewhere. Like in a ditch. There isnt a single person in all of the forums that cares what you have to say.
Ban this kid already.
Everybody has the right to state his/her own opinion as long as post isn't breaking the forum rules. Personal problems with certain users aren't legitimate reason to name calling, bashing, trolling, flaming, etc. him/her posts/ideas/opinions. If you really can't stand someone's post you have the option to ignore said posts via ignore list in your profile without making this decision public show.
It feels really stupid to write stuff like "grow up" on a forum that is supposed to have adult community. I have to suggest to some to start acting like an adults, because they act worse than most teenagers I've seen in other places. It's a shame. Learn some understanding and compassion to those who have different thoughts on the matter and if you can't then at least keep your posts in a civil manner.
It feels really stupid to write stuff like "grow up" on a forum that is supposed to have adult community. I have to suggest to some to start acting like an adults, because they act worse than most teenagers I've seen in other places. It's a shame. Learn some understanding and compassion to those who have different thoughts on the matter and if you can't then at least keep your posts in a civil manner.
That's right and if anyone has a problem with my ideeas and opinions I invite you to dicuss privately in a skype conference. Without calling names and swearing no one has to act childish just because it likes the game how it is now. I am ok with that, so without starting to make suggestions to ban me or callingm me in different names I invite anyone who has a problem or suggestions for me to dicuss them in private.
Why are you so hung up on discussing your ideas in private on Skype? If you can't post them here, why do you think people are going to like them any more if you harass them about it privately?
Stop asking me to add you to Skype, by the way. I don't want to.
"x3ckid" Could actually just be a troll, you guys ever consider that? Even 5 minutes after you guys rage at him for suggesting ridiculous COD style perks, he suggests BOMB DOGS? and RC CAR BOMBS?
You guys are easy bait for someone who likes to troll.
(FYI in case anyone is too old or young: a troll is someone who deliberately makes other forum goers rage, often by pretending to be incredibly stupid, and arguing in that moron-persona)
You guys are easy bait for someone who likes to troll.
(FYI in case anyone is too old or young: a troll is someone who deliberately makes other forum goers rage, often by pretending to be incredibly stupid, and arguing in that moron-persona)
Most trolls would have outed themselves by now, or become bored (I know I would have)... it's just too perfect. I honestly believe he is genuine. He certainly isn't the first person I've come across who has no idea when their 'ideas' are not welcome.
Attention. From this point on any person derailing the thread further will receive an infraction points for breaking the forum rules. Small off topic (as a part of more meaningful post) is to be understood, but such level, heavily derailing any useful contribution, is unacceptable and there is no point in punishing the thread-maker.
Everyone continues to act childish considering that every argument I make about the game like adding new weapons and things like that would be just like Call of duty. But people the thread I spoken that was on-topic was a thread about guns, what you are dicussing now about me is off-topic just because you don't like my iddeas you don't have to act like wimpy childs crying that you want to ban me and things like that. I invited everyone who has a problem with me to dicuss it privately no need to make that public just for the sake of making fun of me.
Also Ross I just sent you a private message to dicuss privately because on any thread I posted you had something to say about my ideeas. I don't think making a suggestion to dicuss privatly with a person is a childish manner to act like that person doesn't try to behave or just tries to troll. Just because I don't want to praise the game for every single thing of this so called realism, yes everybody wants it but is better to have it rather than have enjoyable gameplay? Arma 2 has modified the game in so many ways that everyone enjoys it no matter if it is realistic or not we enjoy gameplay.
So what is the problem for adding some remote controlled bombs in game? You don't know if they would work or not. And this shows how limited people are about thinking on a concept. When someons starts dicussing grenade launchers and Bomb dogs everyone starts pointing that will be exactly like Call of duty. But people this is Red orchestra, has different mechanics how on earth will it be like Call of duty if we implement those features, or you just talking rubish because you continuing to add the argument about the weapons I posted in my last thread?
Also Ross I just sent you a private message to dicuss privately because on any thread I posted you had something to say about my ideeas. I don't think making a suggestion to dicuss privatly with a person is a childish manner to act like that person doesn't try to behave or just tries to troll. Just because I don't want to praise the game for every single thing of this so called realism, yes everybody wants it but is better to have it rather than have enjoyable gameplay? Arma 2 has modified the game in so many ways that everyone enjoys it no matter if it is realistic or not we enjoy gameplay.
So what is the problem for adding some remote controlled bombs in game? You don't know if they would work or not. And this shows how limited people are about thinking on a concept. When someons starts dicussing grenade launchers and Bomb dogs everyone starts pointing that will be exactly like Call of duty. But people this is Red orchestra, has different mechanics how on earth will it be like Call of duty if we implement those features, or you just talking rubish because you continuing to add the argument about the weapons I posted in my last thread?
Last edited:
No problem at all. Just as long it makes the server unranked, classifies it as custom, and has the tagline ''Controled Bombs On'' on server browser
We could also have MP44s, AKs, and M16s from the In Country mod, Helicopters and Miniguns ! All in the name of fun !
As long as it does not touch our beloved ''realism'' modes
Yes but people always think when talking about realism that it should be exactly like in Ostfront. From the begining you enter RO 2 you see that it isn't so what would be the problem of adding in the feature to the game: Panzerfausts, Mg 42, G43 and weapons like that I don't think it will spoil the gameplay.
Just because you don't add them on specific maps that don't really emplay to the gameplay like Coldsteel which I believe it was a factory in Rotterdam, or Arad which is from Romania and the year of the battle takes place in 1944 so why do we still use the old models of T34/Pzkw 4? People don't really mind playing it because it doesn't respect realism and all of that. People want to enjoy the gameplay. And RO 2 isn't Ostfront.
Just because you don't add them on specific maps that don't really emplay to the gameplay like Coldsteel which I believe it was a factory in Rotterdam, or Arad which is from Romania and the year of the battle takes place in 1944 so why do we still use the old models of T34/Pzkw 4? People don't really mind playing it because it doesn't respect realism and all of that. People want to enjoy the gameplay. And RO 2 isn't Ostfront.
@x3ckid,
Please remind that this thread is a poll with the question if MP-41, Luger, G43 and MG42 should be added to the game. It's not a thread about weapons in general.
Please remind that this thread is a poll with the question if MP-41, Luger, G43 and MG42 should be added to the game. It's not a thread about weapons in general.
i was refering on my old thread about guns that people continuing to argument that I posted exotic weapons that wouldve been used in ww2.
But the way the loadout is made now I don't think the producers will emply using the loadouts for specific timelines. I think they will just throw them into the game without any specific timeline features.
