yes but it's mostly just L4D players saying that KF sucks. I have yet to see someone go onto a L4D forum and bash it and say that KF is better. They all come here and troll us. It's a one sided pissing contest.
But does this really justify any senseless L4D bashing on these forums? It doesn't matter to me what they say, and I'm pretty sure nothing we say really matters to them.
See? The developers aren't at war with each other? Why should the fans be? THEY ARE TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT GAMES
Agreed. It's far too often that people here compare the two, when the only thing they have in common is that you kill zombies with various weapons. In fact, I'm not sure why you followed this statement up with many comparisons. I could counter all of them but there's really no point, everything between them is far too subjective to be able to call 'better'.
Actually, allow me to reply to one thing you said:
So yes I agree that there is not much replay value in L4D because there is barely any custom content and there are not DLC packs or ANYTHING to keep it new and fresh. KF has TONS of custom maps, 2 packs of new chars now and 9 new weapons since release and better gameplay overall.
How the hell could a L4D play KF and not realize this unless they were the stupidest gamer on earth?
Errr, more content does not necessarily mean better replay value. Sure there are some nice new weapons to add more variation, but the core gameplay is still the same thing: Wait for zombies to spawn, kill them, wait for the next ones to spawn, kill them. Basically L4D's survival mode, although you have a bigger map to run around in. How could a person not realise this unless they were the stupidest person on earth! (don't take that personally, I just want you to understand how silly such a statement sounds)