Except, you're not actually thinking things through.
I dont even know what you are talking about.
What if the teleport is NOT a temp fix, and they think that it's an okay thing? That's not to say that they won't acknowledge that some people don't like it. But what if they don't know if they'll change it or not. They can't see it's here to stay, because, well they may change their minds to change it during EA. Frankly, even if they've already decided to change it, maybe they're not even thinking about what to replace it with at the moment, because it's so early, and they're still examining the data to see exactly how the teleportation is affecting player movements, death, strategies, etc (or whatever they're looking at).
What the hell... I am just giving an example of what COMMUNICATION looks like. They can say, its too early to judge if teleporting is bad. Or a simple "GET OVER IT" is an actual feedback on what the dev is thinking. Not like what we have now, NOTHING.
You said it yourself, "what if...." if we know if teleporting is intended or not we will be discussing how to make it better OR what to replace teleporting, not arguing if teleporting is intended.
Given the above scenario, they couldn't possibly say what you want them to say. But okay, yours was just a hypothetical. Of course, But what can they say other than...we acknowledge that some people don't like the teleportation, and we're currently examining data on it.
Now, you can't tell me that that you would want that because it's no different than if they just posted "we are working" in every single thread. Because that message says nothing.
NOPE. Huge difference. We will know that is intended gameplay, not somthing who everyone think is a bad way to fix something they want to fix (again we dont even know what they want to fix because we have NOTHING from them). Maybe they will add magic into the game, who knows, so teleporting make sense. But again, we have NOTHING, how are we suppose to give proper feedback if we dont even know if something is intended or not.
lol there you go. It's not that you want information. You just want them to confirm stuff that you want in the game. (I don't even expect there to be more than two abilities per tier.) What if all they plan to have is 2 tiers. Again maybe they'll consider more, so they can't confirm that this is it. (And on the flipside, what if they really don't have no plans to have more than 2 abilities per tier...do they need to say...this is all we plan to have? Do they need to say that about every facet of the game other than maps, weapons, and perks? You don't even realize what you're demanding.)
Again, that was just an example, you just think that I am forcing the dev to do what I want, which I am not,
I am only trying to get some direction from them, so finally we can discuss, not wasting time on 100 posts on how to make teleport better than they remove teleporting. May be the perks are just rushed out because they are not as important, may be they do intend to have a more complicated perk tree, again, we have nothing, and yet they want feedbacks.... about what? We know noting...
Grow up. Maybe because those are the most complicated. Or maybe cause those are the most annoying. Since these big ticket issues are...well...lol let's leave that for their respective threads.
If you, as a "grown up" thinks that growing up means accepting everything without questioning, then I am willing to stay at my "non-grown up state".
