My opinion is that it could have been work that was better put somewhere else and i honestly highly doubt it's going to be anywhere near as fun or balanced as L4D's VS mode (or L4D 2s for that matter) due to the fact that you have a lot of zeds that need balanced and maybe, maybe only a few people will play just like classic mode in RO2/RS.
I suspect that most ppl play and keep playing KF (1 &) 2 because its a break from the ranks of pvp games... all of which are similar in nature and come down to some aspects of gamey gameplay to win.
Its not for me and I will just ignore it. I tried vs mode in ScrN and though it was well made and fun, it was not true PvP. Neither mode is something Id be interested in playing. I play KF for coop which I find more fun than pvp.
I just dont find locating the best spawn-campkill site , KoS or identifying and avoiding <insertname>-bot **** at all appealing. Nor do I want my precious time wasted!
That and the community in L4D suck irregular shaped chihuahua balls. Full of mostly douchebags and scumbags. Yet if thats what ppl want, you cant blame TW for trying to bring in that aspect of the market. More diverse player-base = more sales and more MT revenue.
As for PC gamer hyping it up and saying it's great, what else is new? Seriously, i don't read everything on PC gamer and take it as pure fact because lets be honest, they have a habit of making things sound a lot better than they actually are. I remember a similar topic from PC gamer about the zedconomy being something revolutionary and changing how micro transactions worked when in reality it's pretty much the TF2 system.
Todays youth are easily pleased by bells and whistles. I stopped putting any stock into what most games journos say.