Hoo boy I can't believe this slipped through the cracks. Typing fingers are armed and ready.
Masada is interchangeable to 7.62... A cod player wouldn't know that.
7.62x39, not 7.62x51. A CoD player wouldn't know that, and neither do you.
Yes it is technically a machine gun by definition. It's refire rate is higher than a standard rifle. Maybe you didn't know what "Machine gun" means.
Well aren't you arrogant as all hell. Yes, by the ATF definition, the ACR is a "machine gun". By all other accounts, it's an assault rifle.
RPG was a plausible replacement for a law specifically for the weight, and yes when you're being chased by crazed specimens, weight is an issue. Oh maybe you didn't know but this is a real LAW
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M72_LAW[/URL]
And this is what KF might be using right now :
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FGM-148_Javelin[/URL]
You suck at google. The the LAW-80, a retired British Army antitank weapon, is what's in KF, albeit in a highly modified form.
None of these things are intended to make the game easier. And please... whats a pyro-firebug without molotov cocktails? Never played L4D. Besides I think aesthetically it beats bullets that randomly catch on fire. Real incendiary rounds don't set things on fire like they just got sprayed with napalm and gasoline. . . but maybe you wouldn't know that.
As much as I hate the "incendiary bullets setting things on fire" nonsense that's metastasized throughout modern shooters, most people understand that incendiary ammo does not set people alight but that it's portrayed that way for the sake of gameplay. You know that thing that you totally forgot about in this thread?
And I want to see someone fire the Bren from the hip and then tell me how accurate it really is.
It would be just as accurate as if it were fired from a tripod. I don't think you know what "accuracy" means, but regardless it would be just as controllable as firing the SCAR from the hip, if not more so because the Bren is heavier and fires a lower-powered round.
That gun was typically fired on a tripod from a secure location.
You're joking, right? It was the closest the British Army had to a proper LMG at the time, and was used to provide mobile covering fire for rifleman and submachinegunners. The Bren is plenty controllable firing from prone and using a tripod with a relatively (for WWII) underpowered and heavy LMG with just a 30-round
is pointless unless it's on a vehicle and extra stability is required (not to mention you can afford the extra kilos that a big metal tripod weighs).
It is a heavy gun, it usually had a two man operation to go with it.
For about fifteen minutes. Bren gunners quickly realized that assigning a rifleman to do what a gunner could easily do themselves was a waste of a man and reduced your mobility. The whole "crew served machinegun" thing for the Bren was a holdover from the first world war. I guess it was difficult for the Army to trust a single grunt with anything more complicated or expensive than a bolt-action rifle.
Oh yeah, about female characters... not sure if you guys would know what a normal woman looks like, since some of you only think they look like stalkers. There are women in the military. Don't worry they don't have cooties.
I'm just going to say it an damn the infractions: you're an insufferable cock. You're not gaining any sympathy for being arrogant about your (lack of) knowledge about firearms and military, and you're definitely not helping by insulting the whole forum.
Please, please stop posting. This forum is full of horrible posters as it is.