so why be on their case because some very vocal furries are rather...heinous on the internet.
Yeah, the furry fandom used to be cool what with its clean art (as in what I've just showed) but due to the very accepting atmosphere of the fandom, it managed to attract the most pathetic lifeforms of the planet, those people being the drama whores, the sicker fetishists, zoophiles, babyfurs, and those people who beleive they are animals. And most of them are also very stupid and immature manchildren. The funny part is, though, when these people are posting their porn and cybersex posts where they don't belong, they wonder why everybody hates them, so they go on an internet furry pride parade and treat it as if it were a sexuality/race/religion that they were born into and throw the whole thing in everyone's faces. But because of this, there's a very embarrassing image projected onto the whole thing and I actually agree with everyone who says they should be killed with fire. Trouble is though, the clean and fun anthropomorphic animal art is
nothing to do with what's described and attracts flak for all the wrong reasons.
Anyway, @Mr. Fong, do you always want to e-lynch the creators/posters/promoters of anthropomorphic animal art? If so, you may want to start with Walt Disney and everyone who's been working with him for the past century.
Honestly, I believe that the people who behave like OMG FURRY D: and flame at clean art where there is absolutely no sexualisation whatsoever are no better than the idiotfurs. Hell, even the anime/manga fandom is
just as bad as the furries when it comes to the adult stuff, just have a look! The only difference is is that the anime fandom is far less accepting and "loud".
