Jagdpanther Tank For future mod or map

[FatPartizan]

how bout the T-35 or what I call the Land Battleship. even tho it was used up to the battle of moscow it still looks cool 5 turrets

http://www.wwiivehicles.com/ussr/tanks_heavy/t35.html

Thought that it can be used for break of the strengthened strips. It was very quickly found out that except for propagation (now it name PR), It there is nothing it was not necessary. Them did not try to use at all in winter war. Quite reasonably .

 

[tankman24]

Sorry guys but havent had much time to work on it as far as to gettign it skinned or unwraped. I will as soon as i have a chance, Burning sands projects is whats keeping me busy, so you guys can soon jump on the african front .

 

[Berentzen]

thats good, any infos about the release dates? and pls some new pics from the jagdpanther

 

[Joachim Piper]

Lovely looking model you've done there Tankman, I'd think the green version would be great for use on Arad so that you could blend into the woody background like the Ruskies do.

 

[Bezukhov]

that idea would work on Arad with the Green camo since Arad is in hungary

 

[tankman24]

Bez well as soon i have some time Ill jump on the jaggy again Like i said if someone wants to help out with the unwraping-Skinning well it will help me out caus ei have no time as of now for that.

 

[tankman24]

Guys I have a big suprise look around this section, Ill give u a clue IS the counter attack against Jagdpanther .

 

[Mr.Mind]

So tankman24 do you got eanything new to this sweet baby?

 

[dogbadger]

i would look to increase the number of sides to the roadwheels from what looks like 10 to 14 or at very least to 12.
It seems you have a few tri's up your sleeve so it wont be a prob to do so.

I find large roadwheels, often those that touch track return side on top (like these or the T-34 style) could do with 14, the absence of track return rollers allows more in wheels budget anyway.
med size ( eg - PIII/PIV/KV series ) you can get away with 12, with 10 sides only suitable for v small or obscured wheels IMO.
Nothing wrong with adding more sides than that obviously - your tri count is low already and these are not changes that will complicate or reduce the resolution of your UV map.

 

[karl stiner]

So tankman24 do you got eanything new to this sweet baby?

look here its for Normandy first http://forums.darkesthourgame.com/viewtopic.php?t=1416 http://forums.darkesthourgame.com/viewtopic.php?t=150

 

[Mr.Mind]

Ok, thanks to you

 

[karl stiner]

Ok, thanks to you

your most welcome

 

[tankman24]

THe jagdpanther will surely appear in DH Very soon thats all i can say now

 

[gautrek]

Is this a better shot mate?

Its from the Warsaw army museum.


They also have one of my favourite Russian vehicles of all time.
In fact they have 2 of these beasts.

Plus i am hoping to get there again this year.

 

[karl stiner]

yes the Su100 very good Sp gun but at long range fighting the Jagdpanther is going to be the Nuts. the Gun on the Jagdpanther has fantastic fire power it was the Best Sp gun of world war 2 Nothing will be a problem for it but also the Su100 is a match for most German tanks

 

[dogbadger]

yes the Su100 very good Sp gun but at long range fighting the Jagdpanther is going to be the Nuts. the Gun on the Jagdpanther has fantastic fire power it was the Best Sp gun of world war 2 Nothing will be a problem for it but also the Su100 is a match for most German tanks

yeah of course those are pictures of the early versions of the su 85 - note lack of drum cupola as used on the main run of su85's and later su 100's.
From a modeling point of view it's perhaps not the best looking version and it was somewhat redundant after only a few months when the T34 was upgunned with the 85mm -
never the less this early version will be appearing in the game at some point - as it is needed for specific maps. It's not an immeadiate priority right now though......

Karl you are right about the Su 100 - it was a top class tank destroyer- phaps not jagpanther standards but not too far off.
I'm not really interested in late war tanks so much but if the jagdpanther and king tiger were to make an appearence in ost - the russ could v well do with it added to their arsenal.

 

[karl stiner]

yes your right dogbadger the Su100 must be in the game, i always make a mistake when i See the Su85 and the Su100 i think the Next Russain tank to be made ITS GOT TO BE THE Su100 dont worry about the Su85 they already have the t34/85 they must have New toy that packs A punch http://www.mark-1-tank.co.uk/jpgs/1-6th-t34-85-3101b.jpg[URL="http://www.redorchestragame.com/forum/member.php?u=8240"]

 

[dogbadger]

yes your right dogbadger the Su100 must be in the game, i always make a mistake when i See the Su85 and the Su100 i think the Next Russain tank to be made ITS GOT TO BE THE Su100 dont worry about the Su85 they already have the t34/85 they must have New toy that packs A punch http://www.mark-1-tank.co.uk/jpgs/1-6th-t34-85-3101b.jpghttp://www.mark-1-tank.co.uk/jpgs/1-6th-t34-85-3101b.jpg

I am not opposed to making this tank in principal but it would be a long way down the list for me, it's noot from a persiod of the war i'm looking at to be honest- you would be much more likely to see it from someone else.
Asides from the stuff i intend to help others with - my own projects are all tanks I wanted to see in maps i was working on.
The period i am interested in, as far as tanks on the Ostfront goes, is the mid war period from late 42 - early 44.
That's worked out well for me, as the Ahz guys concentrated on early war, and recently CO and Shurek have looked at later stuff.
I have started work and am now commited to work on the vehicles I have chosen (early version su85 included) for these scenarios but it's nice to avoid doing the same work as others - so no-one wastes their efforts and the community gets more variety.

 

[karl stiner]

I am not opposed to making this tank in principal but it would be a long way down the list for me, it's noot from a persiod of the war i'm looking at to be honest- you would be much more likely to see it from someone else.
Asides from the stuff i intend to help others with - my own projects are all tanks I wanted to see in maps i was working on.
The period i am interested in, as far as tanks on the Ostfront goes, is the mid war period from late 42 - early 44.
That's worked out well for me, as the Ahz guys concentrated on early war, and recently CO and Shurek have looked at later stuff.
I have started work and am now commited to work on the vehicles I have chosen (early version su85 included) for these scenarios but it's nice to avoid doing the same work as others - so no-one wastes their efforts and the community gets more variety.

ok fine i just like late war tank fights myself i still like every on to get what they wont out of this game

 

[dogbadger]

ok fine i just like late war tank fights myself i still like every on to get what they wont out of this game

yeah i do like just abour all afv designs of the war - the su100 being no exception- but i've always been slightly more interested in the to and fro of the mid war period, at least from the point of view of battles and therefore mapping in RO.
However it does mean you miss on a lot of great kit - I prefer the SU-100 to the su-85 obviously on ability but also looks - it just came a little late for my plans.
However I wish the Russians had mounted that D-10 100mm gun on some of the is2 tanks, as was briefly considered before sticking with the more versatile and plentyful 122mm guns/ammo.
Despite what some here have said to the contrary, I have read that the 100mm had a much greater armour piecing capability than the 122mm and taking it as a far less awkward round to load as well, a much faster ROF.
what a tank that would have been...