The reviewer to me does not seem to be a very skilled gamer. This review is only realistic from an FPS beginner's perspective. Some of his complaints seem entirely counter to what the game is to me. I don't think the controls are clunky or "too complicated", if anything it might be a little too easy to move and shoot for the sake of immersion. I also don't think the animation is jerky at all, I think it is some of the best I've ever seen in a multiplayer game. Maybe it is newbie speak for "choppy frame rate"?
At first I thought I had read this review earlier but this is actually a new one where the reviewer claims to be familiar with realistic games and mentions Day of Defeat as an example...
I agree. I think RO2 has its share of problems but this review is obviously written by a 10 year old. Too many position possibilities? Is he really complaining about the ability to go prone? To be able to take cover? Idiotic.
The more possibilities there are, the more control you have, and the more realistic a game is. And fun, in my opinion.
And WTF is he talking about Day of Defeat being realistic???
Last edited: