So you want to turn AK into tier 1, which is a nerf, then nerf either the EBR or SCAR to fit tier 2 plus add weight so they cant both be held simultaneously
I dont see your logic, why do all that nerfing and moving around + adding new weapons and weight to make it balanced for a commando, when you could just nerf the EBR instead to make it balanced for the sharpshooter?
if you go back and re-read my post, that's not exactly what i wanted. i said my ideal solution would be to:
back to my original stance of the commando having 4 weapons and SCAR/EBR both as tier3 weapons, i thought it'd be pointless to go messing around with tweeking the numbers of 3 weapons. that's why i liked the idea that CandleJack (i think) mentioned about adding the L85 to replace the bullpup as the commando's tier1 so that the medic could recieve another "weapon", and the commando's current tier2 and tier3 (including the EBR assuming it was moved) wouldn't need to be touched.
so after all that, not one weapon's numbers have to be tweeked. 2 weapons are moved (EBR and bullpup), 1 brand new weapon is added (L85). three perks receive attention. the SS gets the nerf if needs. Medic gets a boost it needs. Commando stays balanced, BUT gets a new weapon for people to enjoy so that they get some love from TW too
i only provided the "AK as tier1" idea should people really believe that the commando having 4 weapons would be too much. but like you (and i) said, that would be more hassle than it's worth especially since my "ideal" suggestion would require the least amount of work.
you could play as medic to use the bullpup.....but the commando would have a nice, shiny new L85 (the bullpup's

older brother)
Excuse me? Who the heck do you think you are? You don't work with Tripwire Interactive either therefore you have no right to talk.
i'm a board member just as you are. the difference between us regarding this thread is that i am contributing calm, meaningful discussion to the thread while all you are doing is contributing nothing by your unsupported opinion and lack of respect towards other people and their comments. that gives me the right to talk and you the right to leave
The M14EBR is semi-automatic battle rifle to is designed for the sharpshooter and the SCARMK17 is a fully automatic Battle rifle designed for the commando.
no it's not simple. please go back and re-read the facts stated that show otherwise. both weapons by their current design are effective for spamming. the only difference between the two weapons are the perk attributes and bonuses that are currently being applied to them due to their current perk alotment.
Whats the point of swaping them?
i've explained that enough already....please re-read the thread to familiarize yourself with the discussion and arguements already made
You could just give the SCAR iron sights and the M14EBR a scope?
that wouldn't come close to solving the overall problem or even help reduce it. the EBR would still be easy to spam from the hip and remain just as effective at it as it currently is. the SCAR having/not having a scope isn't an issue. the weapon is already balanced and is not in discussion. the EBR is the focus here
C'mon thats like suggesting the Bullpup and AK shud go to the demo and the nade launchers should go to firebug!
that's quite an exagerated (and absurd) comparision. are you trying to hint that you're just trolling me here? if this is a serious rebutal, then please elaberate on why exactly my idea is as "rediculous" as suggesting that the AK and bullpup should go to the demo and the nade launchers to the firebug......i'm all ears and would love to see you try to support that comment.
The M14EBR WILL STAY WITH THE SHARPSHOOTEE AND THE SCARMK17 WILL STAY WITH THE COMMANDO.
you already said that....so i'll politely ask you again, can you provide a logical arguement with corresponding facts/statistics to support that conclusion?
TWI is probably laughing at the fact the you even suggested this in the first place.
you first assume they read all this to begin with, which is probably unlikely. however, i beg to differ about them laughing at it. why? i assume that TW has as much intelligence and common sense as i believe they do. if you actually look at the suggestion in it's entirety, it's really an effective and practical solution. the problem is that some people such as yourself, refuse to actually look at the suggestion and its support, and blinding attack it simply because you "don't like it".
Your simply waisting your energy suggestion this man.
i might be......but its not like it takes so much time or energy away from my life to post what i post. i also quite enjoy these kind of things just to see the how people act/react.....think of it as a sociology/pyschology case study. and honestly, my gaming time is replaced by my forum time due to being bored by the games i currently own and no other games that interest me are out yet (ROHOS) or are reasonably priced for me to buy it.
I think we've got the answer to the thread now can you please stop acting like an ignorant fool?
i believe "arrogant" would be the appropriate word you want to use to describe the way you think i'm acting, not ignorant. you however would be the ignorant one as you obviously haven't even seriously looked at the suggestion or arguements that support it. as for an answer, there is no answer until the game is updated and this suggestion is implimented, or until TW closes the thread and says "sorry, we won't be implimenting the idea"......until one of those happens, i don't mind continuing to calmly keep the discussion going.
I would most appreciate this, thank you.
just as i would most appreciate you actually contributing something valuable to the thread......or just honorably bowing out if you cannot contribute anything meaningful to the discussion.
