General Firearm Discussion

  • Please make sure you are familiar with the forum rules. You can find them here: https://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/index.php?threads/forum-rules.2334636/

JCoquillon

FNG / Fresh Meat
Nov 21, 2005
874
134
0
38
Europe
But only these wars then:

The Spanish Civil War.
The Russian Civil War.
The Spanish-American War.
The War of 1812.

Well that list is quite achievable - the only slightly harder one is the Spanish Civil War. Although funnily it is probably 95% completed by just combining all the firearms used in the other 3 wars in the list.
 

LemoN

FNG / Fresh Meat
Feb 26, 2006
6,293
2,346
0
33
Prussotroll's Bridge
Well that list is quite achievable - the only slightly harder one is the Spanish Civil War. Although funnily it is probably 95% completed by just combining all the firearms used in the other 3 wars in the list.
Go ahead and start with the Russian Civil War, I'll watch you fail. :D
 

Peter.Steele

FNG / Fresh Meat
Sep 6, 2006
2,128
779
0
Chambers of the Grand Council
Not to mention the foreign troops deployed to, for instance, the Russian Civil War. Did you know that there were about a quarter of a million troops from about 10-15 different national armies that intervened? I mean US Army deployed ~25,000 troops. British and French Armies together sent ~50-75,000. Imperial Japanese Army sent ~75,000 by itself. Then there were the Czechs, Canadians, Greeks, Romanians, Italians ...


Also, a really big hint of potential 'troll-ness' is the use of the term 'War of 1812' by a European. That's pretty much a term used only by Americans, who couldn't have cared less about what was going on in the rest of the world at the time, and it was just a minor sideshow to what should have been called the First World War, running from about 1792 through 1815. Or, actually off and on since the late 17th century through 1815 or so...
 

Z008MJ

FNG / Fresh Meat
Feb 3, 2011
167
37
0
Not to mention the foreign troops deployed to, for instance, the Russian Civil War. Did you know that there were about a quarter of a million troops from about 10-15 different national armies that intervened? I mean US Army deployed ~25,000 troops. British and French Armies together sent ~50-75,000. Imperial Japanese Army sent ~75,000 by itself. Then there were the Czechs, Canadians, Greeks, Romanians, Italians ...

Ok, skip the Russian Civil War then.

I was just hoping some website would have listed this by now ....

Also, a really big hint of potential 'troll-ness' is the use of the term 'War of 1812' by a European. That's pretty much a term used only by Americans, who couldn't have cared less about what was going on in the rest of the world at the time, and it was just a minor sideshow to what should have been called the First World War, running from about 1792 through 1815. Or, actually off and on since the late 17th century through 1815 or so...

What would a European call it then? Is there another name?
 

Nicholas

FNG / Fresh Meat
Sep 16, 2010
1,275
665
0
Not to mention the foreign troops deployed to, for instance, the Russian Civil War. Did you know that there were about a quarter of a million troops from about 10-15 different national armies that intervened? I mean US Army deployed ~25,000 troops. British and French Armies together sent ~50-75,000. Imperial Japanese Army sent ~75,000 by itself. Then there were the Czechs, Canadians, Greeks, Romanians, Italians ...


Also, a really big hint of potential 'troll-ness' is the use of the term 'War of 1812' by a European. That's pretty much a term used only by Americans, who couldn't have cared less about what was going on in the rest of the world at the time, and it was just a minor sideshow to what should have been called the First World War, running from about 1792 through 1815. Or, actually off and on since the late 17th century through 1815 or so...

I've actually been thinking, why aren't the Napoleonic wars WW1? Then WW1 WW2, and WW2 WW3? Maybe even the war on terror can be considered the beginning of WW4.

Also, isn't WW2 justa continuation of WW1? So maybe they should be the same.
 

LemoN

FNG / Fresh Meat
Feb 26, 2006
6,293
2,346
0
33
Prussotroll's Bridge
I've actually been thinking, why aren't the Napoleonic wars WW1? Then WW1 WW2, and WW2 WW3? Maybe even the war on terror can be considered the beginning of WW4.

Also, isn't WW2 justa continuation of WW1? So maybe they should be the same.
Being philosophical, are we? ;)
 

Nicholas

FNG / Fresh Meat
Sep 16, 2010
1,275
665
0
Since this year is 2011, do you think there will be 100 year anniversery 1911's?
 

Peter.Steele

FNG / Fresh Meat
Sep 6, 2006
2,128
779
0
Chambers of the Grand Council
Since this year is 2011, do you think there will be 100 year anniversery 1911's?



I'm sure that's never occurred to any of the manufacturers out there.

Spoiler!
 

Nicholas

FNG / Fresh Meat
Sep 16, 2010
1,275
665
0
That looks cool but....

I can't own a pistol for a 3 years until I'm 21.

Pistol ammo is really expensive.

I don't need a historical relic, I need something to protect myself with, this countries hard on people.
 

Reddog

FNG / Fresh Meat
Dec 7, 2005
2,572
476
0
Australia
That looks cool but....

I can't own a pistol for a 3 years until I'm 21.

Pistol ammo is really expensive.

I don't need a historical relic, I need something to protect myself with, this countries hard on people.
The 1911A1 is a great pistol even these days, solid, reliable and hard hitting. If you want cheap ammo costs I hear the CZ52 is a good option.
 

Z008MJ

FNG / Fresh Meat
Feb 3, 2011
167
37
0
The War of the Spanish Succession and the Seven Years' War could probably be included too.

But then there would be little point in asking what guns were used, as gun usage was very small and the difference between guns were not large either, as well as gun model names being mostly unknown.