CPU at fast cloak, dual graphic card isn't exactly an example of average, low end pc.
and I bet most here who says his performance is fine basically have uber fast quad core cpu or better, 8G ram minimum, minimum gtx560ti or better cards.
Not exactly no. I'm able to run it on atleast 40 fps regardless of map and playercount on Ultra on my HD6850 with 4gb DDR3 RAM and my PhenomII 965 quad @ 3.4ghz, although i guess that is a rather high clock....and I bet most here who says his performance is fine basically have uber fast quad core cpu or better, 8G ram minimum, minimum gtx560ti or better cards.
I love how people state what performance one can and cannot get on their own PC. Great way to come across like a complete idiot.
Yeah, just like throwing insults on an internet forum.
I've got a friend with a better setup than yours and the game doesn't run much better than it does on my POS PC.
So excuse me if your testimony doesn't exactly sound believable.
Nah, this thing seems to be poorly optimized due to dev's less caring for performance.
Clearly you know little about PCs and the multitude of ways they can be configured, so you insinuate I'm lying instead.
Lol oh man so hostile.
Alright bud, you're clearly a master and I've got no idea what I'm talking about. I'll go back to my cave and pretend the case I described doesn't cover about 75% of the people with performance issues.
Fact is this game tends to run poorly on exceptional hardware. Just because you happened to have a low end setup which runs the game so flawlessly doesn't mean everyone else is just an idiot with no idea about PCs.
The reason I said you don't get that performance is because my PC is very similar to yours, and the only time I get reasonable framerates is when playing with about 24-32 people. I thought my comment obviously jumped the gun and would be taken with a grain of salt, but I guess I underestimated your temper.
If you want to make another smart remark about it, feel free. It'll go unread, at least by me.