For me it's not arguing realism but it's more the opposite of infntnub's post. I like throwing flame and Shrapnel puts me off, I simply prefer the stream of fire and the wailing crowds to just gibbing everything. Maybe it's just me but I prefer the vast majority of my kills remain intact, gibbing just takes that away from me!
Hell, I got to wave 7 of 10 on Hell on Earth Solo without Shrapnel or MWG and even Heatwave for a while. Was doing fine really, was C4 that ended it!
I just want to be able to pick an option that doesn't gib all my kills but doesn't cause problems for my team because I've picked a weak gimping option. Shrapnel makes throwing flame less fun for me though.
I personally think it should change to a blast with a lot more fire and a lot less pressure - no gibbing, just a forceful blast of flame erupting from inside the zed and torching everything nearby. Like Combustion but no gibs and a more flamey blast.
Of course I suggest this alongside the burning being enough to kill what it hits (trash wise) so that you essentially get the same effect but it spreads fire instead of being a giant HX25 pellet.
Hell, I got to wave 7 of 10 on Hell on Earth Solo without Shrapnel or MWG and even Heatwave for a while. Was doing fine really, was C4 that ended it!
I just want to be able to pick an option that doesn't gib all my kills but doesn't cause problems for my team because I've picked a weak gimping option. Shrapnel makes throwing flame less fun for me though.
I personally think it should change to a blast with a lot more fire and a lot less pressure - no gibbing, just a forceful blast of flame erupting from inside the zed and torching everything nearby. Like Combustion but no gibs and a more flamey blast.
Of course I suggest this alongside the burning being enough to kill what it hits (trash wise) so that you essentially get the same effect but it spreads fire instead of being a giant HX25 pellet.