I understand censoring sexual depictions of nudity or suggestive imagery to a younger audience.
What i don't understand is censoring human naughty parts when sexuality is clearly not the point. Sometimes, the situation just calls for some non-sexualized nudity. It's specially jarring when games and movies cover up said naughty bits when you know that if said situation where to happen in real life, those body parts would probably be exposed.
It usually comes off as ridiculous when you make it a point to cover up breasts and genitalia in places where you should be able to get away with them, such as monsters, zombies, corpses, even sex (remember dragon age's clothed "sex" scene?).
I know most movie, games and whetever other pieces of media that claim they are "adult" usually do so as an excuse to just throw in some gratuitous nudity, sex and violence, in reality making them feel childish.
But so do these misguided censoring criteria.
Besides, it's not like any teen would jerk off to this topless mutilated monstrosity...right?...
right?...
But we are getting sidetracked here,
i'll post some possible child-safe-ESRB-approved versions and let the community decide..