Mosin Nagants have a problem known as "sticky bolt". They often almost jam to a point where you have to kick the bolt to get it to come back. I don't know what causes this but shooting a Mosin Nagant after being in the field for god knows how many months will never be easy.
This.
You made a very poor choice in using the SMLE - a weapon world-renowned for being the smoothest and easiest to rechamber- as an example of the "standard" bolt-action rifle in action. If you want to make a point, you don't use a weapon that is a cut above everything else as an example, its a poor benchmark.
For what its worth, mauser style rifles were generally considered robust and well-made pieces of equipment, but they were certainly no Lee-Enfields. Mauser were the world's AK-47s at that time. Almost every major military power had a mauser-style rifle, or (like in the case of China) a shameless non-licensed copy of the original.
My point is, the Mauser was made to be mass produced, it was a good weapon, but it wasn't capable of what you show in your, ahem, 'historical refrences'. Tovarich Nemstov already filled you in on the shortcomings of the Nagant series of rifles.
At the end of the day...you always have your bayonet
Last edited: